2021
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of pH and substrate supply on the ratio of iron to sulfate reduction

Abstract: Iron reduction and sulfate reduction often occur simultaneously in anoxic systems, and where that is the case, the molar ratio between the reactions (i.e., Fe/SO 4 2− reduced) influences their impact on water quality and carbon storage. Previous research has shown that pH and the supply of electron donors and acceptors affect that ratio, but it is unclear how their influences compare and affect one another. This study examines impacts of pH and the supply of acetate, sulfate, and goethite on the ratio of iron … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dependence emerged somewhat unexpectedly from the emulator as one would not inherently expect a relationship between injectate pCO 2 and SO 2− 4 reduction rates, yet it agrees with results previously reported by Kirk (2016, 2018), as well as by Paper et al (2021). These studies related the influence of pCO 2 and pH to the rate of microbial reactions in vitro, in situ, and in silico.…”
Section: Application To the Old Rifle Sitesupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This dependence emerged somewhat unexpectedly from the emulator as one would not inherently expect a relationship between injectate pCO 2 and SO 2− 4 reduction rates, yet it agrees with results previously reported by Kirk (2016, 2018), as well as by Paper et al (2021). These studies related the influence of pCO 2 and pH to the rate of microbial reactions in vitro, in situ, and in silico.…”
Section: Application To the Old Rifle Sitesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Emulation makes sensitivity analysis for RTMs simple and allows us to identify correlations and interactions among parameters that would otherwise be difficult to anticipate by allowing an investigator to quickly test a wide variety of hypotheses. We demonstrate this in the case of Old Rifle by identifying the CO 2 dependency of microbially mediated reactions (Bethke et al, 2011;Kirk, 2016, 2018;Paper et al, 2021). This ability to elucidate unexpected but key model dependencies and sensitivities could prove to be invaluable in helping direct RTM development.…”
Section: Using Emulators To Identify New Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This dependence emerged somewhat unexpectedly from the emulator, as one would not inherently expect a relationship between injectate pCO2 and SO 4 2reduction rates, yet it agrees with results previously reported by Kirk (2016, 2018) as well as Paper et al (2021). These studies related the influence of pCO2 and pH to the rate of microbial reactions, both in vitro, in situ, and in silico.…”
Section: Training Strategysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Further to this, the ability to evaluate the state of a system after a fixed period of time makes the emulator approach ideally suited for modelling more complex time-series models with time varying boundary conditions: instead of having to run the RTM forward each time the system changes boundary conditions, the emulator can be interrogated for the expected result given the systems current state from the previous regime. Emulation makes sensitivity analysis for RTMs simple and allows us to identify correlations and interactions among parameters that would otherwise be difficult to anticipate, for example the CO2 dependency of microbially mediated reactions (Bethke et al, 2011;Kirk, 2016, 2018;Paper et al, 2021). This ability to elucidate unexpected but key model dependencies and sensitivities could prove invaluable in helping direct RTM development.…”
Section: Advantages Over Directly Interrogating the Simulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b). The increase was coeval with the rapid increase in iron concentrations, indicating the onset of iron and/or sulphate reduction as these are both protons consuming/alkalinity producing reactions (Paper et al, 2021). The variability in releases between replicate columns may be attributed to the variations in flow path/residence time.…”
Section: Iron Release and Ph/orp/ecmentioning
confidence: 93%