Influences of serrated trailing edge on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of a flapping wing during hovering flight

Abstract

The influences of serrated trailing edge on the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic performance of a flapping wing during hovering flight are investigated using a hybrid framework of an immersed boundary Navier–Stokes solver for the flow field and the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW–H) analogy for the sound field. A rigid rectangular wing with an aspect ratio of 2 undergoes pitching and stroke motions at a Reynolds number (Re) of 310 and a Mach number (M) of 0.012. Simulations are conducted by varying the dimensionless wavenumber k* from 2π to 10π and wave amplitude 2h* from 0.25 to 1.0. We find that at k*=8π and 2h*=1.5 (D4), the average sound power level is reduced by up to 6.8 dB within the Strouhal number (St) between 2.0 and 4.0 compared to that of a plain trailing edge while the lift coefficient is maintained. The directivity at St = 0.2, St = 0.4, St = 2.2, and St = 2.4 is discussed. It is found that the serrations of D4 do not affect the directivity for the first two frequencies and significantly reduce the magnitude of the directivity for the last two frequencies. The serrations of D4 considerably alter the flow field near the wing surface and reduced the surface pressure fluctuations near the wing tip, leading to the noise reduction. The lift coefficient of D4 is not significantly changed, because the reduction in the pressure-contributed lift is compensated by an increase in the shear stress-contributed lift. The serrations with higher 2h* and k* have larger shear stress-contributed lift.

Recent Advances in Airfoil Self-Noise Passive Reduction

“…TE serrations, also known as sawtooth or notched TEs, are a design feature to mitigate these noise sources [209]. These serrations are essentially small notches or teeth along the TE of an airfoil or blade, employed in engineering applications such as wind turbines [210], aircraft wings [211], and fan blades [212] to reduce aeroacoustic noise. In general, TE serrations offer a potential solution for decreasing aeroacoustic noise by disrupting vortex shedding, enhancing BL stability, and diffusing sound waves, as explained in the following:…”

A Bibliometric Analysis of Flapping Wing Instrumentation

“…These can also utilize CFD modeling, in which a system is defined in fluid dynamics software, and the system performance is extracted through simulation. This can be used to vary factors such as wing sizing [83], surface modifications [84][85][86], or moving the pivot point in folding wings [87][88][89]. It can also analyze changing kinematics [90,91], angles of attack [92], or other parameters [93,94].…”

Power synchronisations determine the hovering flight efficiency of passively pitching flapping wings

“…In the MAV designs, it is technically easier to change the wing planform compared with implementing changes in the wing kinematics (Ansari, Knowles & Zbikowski 2008a,b). Therefore, several studies have been conducted to seek the optimal wing shape for various sizes and Reynolds number scales (Luo & Sun 2005;Ansari et al 2008b;Young et al 2009;Stanford et al 2012;Li & Dong 2016;Shahzad et al 2016Shahzad et al , 2018aBhat et al 2019b;Ji et al 2022;. Specifically, Ansari et al (2008b) numerically studied the effects of various synthetic wing planforms with fully prescribed kinematics on the aerodynamic performance.…”