2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-021-01152-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of structural anisotropy and heterogeneity on three-dimensional strain fields and cracking patterns of a clay-rich rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the UCS of the structures with consistent mineral composition is mainly determined by the included angle between the dominant inclusion inclination and loading direction. This finding extends the conclusion in the literature [23] suggesting that the failure strength is strongly dependent on the included angle between the loading direction and bedding planes. The inclusion-matrix interfaces constituted by the dominant inclusions are the mesoscopic structural planes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the UCS of the structures with consistent mineral composition is mainly determined by the included angle between the dominant inclusion inclination and loading direction. This finding extends the conclusion in the literature [23] suggesting that the failure strength is strongly dependent on the included angle between the loading direction and bedding planes. The inclusion-matrix interfaces constituted by the dominant inclusions are the mesoscopic structural planes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Sui et al studied the microstructural deformation of a tight sandstone by the in situ loading/scanning experiment and deformation simulation method [21]. Shi et al investigated the three-dimensional nonuniform strain fields and cracking patterns of claystone by the uniaxial compression creep test, digital volume correlation (DVC) method, and X-ray microtomography [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transverse isotropy is a common type of anisotropy in which the material properties are symmetric about a bedding plane and anisotropic in the direction normal to this plane 19–23 . The effect of anisotropy on the stiffness and strength of various transversely isotropic rocks has been extensively investigated in the literature 24–31 . The stiffness and strength of transversely isotropic rocks depend on the direction of the load with respect to the orientation of the bedding plane, and are often different in the bed‐normal (BN) and bed‐parallel (BP) directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21][22][23] The effect of anisotropy on the stiffness and strength of various transversely isotropic rocks has been extensively investigated in the literature. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The stiffness and strength of transversely isotropic rocks depend on the direction of the load with respect to the orientation of the bedding plane, and are often different in the bed-normal (BN) and bed-parallel (BP) directions. The maximum strength can occur in either direction, but the minimum strength typically occurs when the load is inclined with the bedding plane, often at an angle 𝜃 between 20 and 40 • .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%