Influences of subphase pH and temperature on the interfacial aggregation behavior of poly(lauryl methacrylate)-block-poly(methacrylic acid)

Jiang, Kun; Wen, Gangyao; Skandalis, Athanasios; Pispas, Stergios; Ding, Yanping; Chen, Hongxu

doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126528

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many researchers have demonstrated the ability of amphiphilic block copolymers to self-assemble into various monolayers at the air–water interface, − and the formation of nanoaggregates can be primarily controlled by modifying the polymer composition. Some common linear copolymers, such as polystyrene- block -poly(ethylene oxide) (PS- b -PEO), − polystyrene- block -poly(methyl methacrylate) (PS- b -PMMA), − and polystyrene- block -poly(2-vinylpyridine) (PS- b -P2VP), , have been comprehensively studied.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Closely Packed Core–Shell Micelle Structures of Double Hydrophilic Miktoarm Star Copolymers at the Air–Water Interface

Zhang,

Wen,

Giaouzi

et al. 2024

Langmuir

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aggregation behavior of amphiphilic block copolymers at the air−water interface has been extensively studied, but less attention was given to that of star copolymers. In this work, we studied the interfacial aggregation behavior of two double hydrophilic pH-and temperatureresponsive miktoarm star copolymers of poly[di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate]-poly [2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate] (PDEG-MA 3 -PDMAEMA 3 and PDEGMA 4 -PDMAEMA 7 , the subscripts denote arm numbers) with different molecular weights. The effects of subphase pH and temperature on the monolayer isotherms and hysteresis curves of the two star copolymers and the morphologies of their Langmuir−Blodgett (LB) films were studied by the Langmuir film balance technique and atomic force microscopy, respectively. At the air−water interface, the two star copolymers tend to form closely packed micelles. These micelles exhibit a core−shell structure, where the small hydrophobic core consists of cross-linker of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) and the carbon backbones of PDEGMA and PDMAEMA arms and the short hydrophilic shell is composed of di(ethylene glycol) and tertiary amine side groups. With increasing subphase pH, the surface pressure versus molecular area isotherms shift toward larger mean molecular areas as a result of the enhanced interface adsorption of nonprotonated tertiary amine groups. The isotherm shift of PDEGMA 3 -PDMAEMA 3 monolayers is primarily attributed to high density of tertiary amine groups in the shells, while that of PDEGMA 4 -PDMAEMA 7 is mainly attributed to high density of di(ethylene glycol) groups in the shells. The hysteresis degrees in the monolayers of the two copolymers under alkaline and neutral conditions are greater than those under acidic conditions due to the decreased protonation degree of the tertiary amine groups. At 10 °C, the mobility of the shells is poor and the isotherms are located on the right. Above the lower critical solution temperature, di(ethylene glycol) groups contract, which causes a slight shift of the isotherms toward smaller mean molecular areas.

show abstract