2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.943600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences on cognitive outcomes in adult patients with gliomas: A systematic review

Abstract: People with brain tumors, including those previously treated, are commonly affected by a range of neurocognitive impairments involving executive function, memory, attention, and social/emotional functioning. Several factors are postulated to underlie this relationship, but evidence relating to many of these factors is conflicting and does not fully explain the variation in cognitive outcomes seen in the literature and in clinical practice. To address this, we performed a systematic literature review to identif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although tumor-related factors can play an important role in neurocognitive outcomes of a patient, the final outcome of the patient is more complicated than tumor-related only. Neurodegenerative, connectome and metabolic changes are not only affected by the tumor or surgery, but also by patient-related factors such as age, cognitive reserve or education level, gender, and genetic factors [ 46 ], as well as additional treatments (including anti-epileptic drugs [ 47 ] and corticosteroid treatment and possible medical complications (including epileptic seizures [ 48 ]). Each of these components is intrinsically related to the tumor type, which can complicate the correct risk stratification for neurocognitive decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although tumor-related factors can play an important role in neurocognitive outcomes of a patient, the final outcome of the patient is more complicated than tumor-related only. Neurodegenerative, connectome and metabolic changes are not only affected by the tumor or surgery, but also by patient-related factors such as age, cognitive reserve or education level, gender, and genetic factors [ 46 ], as well as additional treatments (including anti-epileptic drugs [ 47 ] and corticosteroid treatment and possible medical complications (including epileptic seizures [ 48 ]). Each of these components is intrinsically related to the tumor type, which can complicate the correct risk stratification for neurocognitive decline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Postoperative attentional and executive dysfunctions are common following brain tumor resection, affecting both patients’ quality of life and functional recovery 1,2 . Indeed, after surgery immediate outcome in attentive domain in glioma patients can sometimes reveal cognitive deficits, even in absence of clear presurgical insufficient performance 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impairments in cognition are common in patients with current and previously treated brain tumours, 1,2 and likely arise from a range of complex, interacting risk factors including patient‐, tumour‐ and treatment‐specific variables. Some of the most well‐studied putative influences on cognitive dysfunction include cranial irradiation, surgery, tumour characteristics including volume and location, and anti‐epileptic drug use 1 . There is evidence indicating that cognitive impairments negatively influence patient outcomes including quality of life (QOL) and survival 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the most well‐studied putative influences on cognitive dysfunction include cranial irradiation, surgery, tumour characteristics including volume and location, and anti‐epileptic drug use. 1 There is evidence indicating that cognitive impairments negatively influence patient outcomes including quality of life (QOL) and survival. 3 As such, there is great interest in methods to ameliorate (improve) or prevent cognitive impairments in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%