2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(03)00148-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
147
5
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
147
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The cows seem to remember and avoid those stockpersons who have treated them roughly (Munksgaard et al, 1997, and it was shown that the avoidance distance increases on farms where rough handling is frequent (Waiblinger et al, 2003;Rushen and de Pasillé., 2015). Cows can distinguish people and seem to generalise previous experience, especially if the people working around them wear clothing of the same colour (Munksgaard et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cows seem to remember and avoid those stockpersons who have treated them roughly (Munksgaard et al, 1997, and it was shown that the avoidance distance increases on farms where rough handling is frequent (Waiblinger et al, 2003;Rushen and de Pasillé., 2015). Cows can distinguish people and seem to generalise previous experience, especially if the people working around them wear clothing of the same colour (Munksgaard et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these housing conditions, it is likely that bulls had less opportunity to progressively adapt to the presence of stockpeople, which would shorten their flight distance (Hemsworth et al, 2000). A further hypothesis to explain the same result could come from the higher number of animals housed per each deep litter pen taking the negative correlation between avoidance distance and number of pen-mates into account reported by Waiblinger et al (2003) for horned dairy cows. The same authors suggested that high competition among horned cattle in the feeding area could enhance their alertness and consequently their reaction to an unfamiliar person.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…With regard to the getting-up movement,weshowed ap icture with the two movements (normal and abnormal; Figure 1) to the farmers, askingt hem which was the more common way of getting up in their herd. Although several other parameterscan be used to evaluate cows' welfare (e.g., behavioural response to humans or behaviour during milking; Waiblinger et al, 2003;Hagen et al, 2004),t hese were not takeninto account in the present investigation, as their measurement is more time-consuming, and it was impossible for the veterinaryo fficer who carried out this survey to spend too mucht ime for each inspection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%