1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0213-9111(95)71259-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencia de la edad y sexo sobre los distintos, tipos de utilización en atención primaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low number of non-face-to-face contacts and home visits stood out; this is a potential area of care for chronic patients that should be strengthened, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The average number of contacts with family doctors in our study was lower than the average number of physician consultations reported in comparable studies [ 33 , 34 ]. However, it was almost double number of contacts with nurses, unlike previous studies in which the average number of contacts with nurses was higher than with doctors [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The low number of non-face-to-face contacts and home visits stood out; this is a potential area of care for chronic patients that should be strengthened, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The average number of contacts with family doctors in our study was lower than the average number of physician consultations reported in comparable studies [ 33 , 34 ]. However, it was almost double number of contacts with nurses, unlike previous studies in which the average number of contacts with nurses was higher than with doctors [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Among the possible explanations for this increased utilization are that women report a worse perceived state of health and have a higher prevalence of minor affective disorders that can generate the need for health consultations; additionally, women are also often caregivers or heads of the household, which could favor a need to consult health services on behalf of other family members [ 34 ]. In contrast, nurse consultations were more frequent among high-risk men, which could be due to less self-care capacity among men, especially those in older age ranges [ 34 ]. The results show that increased age was associated with a major number of contacts for most types and forms and with professionals other than pediatricians, midwives, physical therapists and dentists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Social support was measured by DUKE-UNC-11 [50], an 11-item questionnaire that measured functional elements of social support (including confidant and affective support) and validated for the Spanish population (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.90) [51,52]. Each item is valued in a 5-points scale ranging from 1 ("much less than I would like") to 5 points ("as much as I would like").…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is valued in a 5-points scale ranging from 1 ("much less than I would like") to 5 points ("as much as I would like"). A final score ranging from 5 to 55 is obtained; 32 points or below correspond to a low social support and more than 32 points correspond to a normal social support [52].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Social context of the patient: environment in which the patient lived, number of individuals living with the patient, presence of a family member caregiver, characteristics of the family caregiver (age, sex, relationship, level of education, housing), social support received, through the DUKE questionnaire, (Bellón Saameño et al, 1996) an instrument with an adequate reliability, as shown by its Cronbach's alpha of 0.90, and appropriate construct and criterion validity; loneliness through the UCLA scale (Velarde-Mayol et al, 2016), this scale has an adequate reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.95, and with satisfactory results in its construct and discriminant validity; and lastly, the effort of the caregiver was measured with the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) (López Alonso & Moral Serrano, 2005), which obtained a Cronbach's alpha of 0.80, and an adequate criterion validity for its use in the screening of strain experienced by the caregiver.…”
Section: Variables and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%