2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2016956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing Elections with Statistics: Targeting Voters with Logistic Regression Trees

Abstract: Political campaigning has become a multi-million dollar business. A substantial proportion of a campaign's budget is spent on voter mobilization, i.e., on identifying and influencing as many people as possible to vote. Based on data, campaigns use statistical tools to provide a basis for deciding who to target. While the data available is usually rich, campaigns have traditionally relied on a rather limited selection of information, often including only previous voting behavior and one or two demographical var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancela and Geys [2016] conduct a meta-analysis of 185 articles focused on voter turnout in the U.S., finding that campaign expenditures, election closeness and registration require-ments have more explanatory power in national elections, whereas population size and composition, concurrent elections, and the electoral system play a more important role for explaining turnout at subnational elections. More recently, machine learning methods, trained on individual-level socio-demographic data have been applied by campaigns to micro-target potential voters (Rusch et al [2013]). A recent research on voter turnout which is particularly relevant to our analysis is the paper by Biesiada [2018],who analyzes county-level voter turnout and finds that inequality, education, past voter turnout, gender proportion and median age are significantly associated with turnout at the county-level.…”
Section: Voter Turnoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancela and Geys [2016] conduct a meta-analysis of 185 articles focused on voter turnout in the U.S., finding that campaign expenditures, election closeness and registration require-ments have more explanatory power in national elections, whereas population size and composition, concurrent elections, and the electoral system play a more important role for explaining turnout at subnational elections. More recently, machine learning methods, trained on individual-level socio-demographic data have been applied by campaigns to micro-target potential voters (Rusch et al [2013]). A recent research on voter turnout which is particularly relevant to our analysis is the paper by Biesiada [2018],who analyzes county-level voter turnout and finds that inequality, education, past voter turnout, gender proportion and median age are significantly associated with turnout at the county-level.…”
Section: Voter Turnoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way we are able to identify clusters of firms that are homogeneous in terms of parameters of their bankruptcy model or, in other words, we identify local stationarity in the bankruptcy probability model over the different firms. For further details on LRT refer to Breiman et al (1984) and Rusch et al (2013).…”
Section: Textiles(%) 16mentioning
confidence: 99%