Influencing factors in the implementation of postgraduate medical e-learning: a thematic analysis

Abstract

Background Postgraduate medical e-learning (PGMeL) is being progressively used and evaluated. Its impact continues to grow, yet there are barriers to its implementation. Although more attention is now being paid to quality evaluation models, little has been written about the successful implementation of PGMeL. This study aims to determine factors and define themes influencing the successful implementation of PGMeL. Methods We performed 10 semi-structured interviews with experienced e-learning creators, after which we carried out a thematic analysis to name and describe factors and themes. Results Although this was not the objective of the study, the participants stressed the importance of a definition of success. Associated with this definition were: reaching your target audience, achieving learning aims, satisfying your audience and maintaining continuity. Three themes were identified containing eleven factors that influence successful implementation. The themes were named and defined after the group that had the most influence on the factors. We named them creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors. The creator dependent factors are: the learning aim, pedagogical strategies, content expertise, evaluation and the creators motivational path. The organization dependent factors are management support, recourse and culture. Finally, the learner dependent factors are technology, motivators/barriers and value. Conclusions This study shows that implementing PGMeL has creator-, organization- and learner-dependent factors which should be taken into account during the creating of the PGMeL. Although creator- and learner-dependent factors are mentioned in other studies, the present study also stresses the importance of organization-dependent factors. Innovation implementation theories such as Rogers’ diffusion of innovation or Kotter’s eight steps of change management show a great overlap with these factors. Future studies can both evaluate the use of these innovation models in creating PGMeL and assess the effect of the organizational factors in greater depth. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-019-1720-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Academic Motivation of University Students and the Factors that Influence it in an E-Learning Environment

“…Compared to traditional education modes, students' satisfaction in e-learning increases greatly along with perceived ease of access, navigation, interactivity, and interface use (De Leeuw et al, 2019). As a rule, e-learning is externally regulated, which implies that many students are more likely to complete such assignments with largely extrinsic motivation brought into play.…”

The Empirical Study of College Students’ E-Learning Effectiveness and Its Antecedents Toward the COVID-19 Epidemic Environment

“…Students should also actively think about and set learning objectives for themselves. What is more, they should take practical actions to achieve them ( de Leeuw et al, 2019 ).…”

Studies on the success criteria and critical success factors for mega infrastructure construction projects: a literature review

“…During the analysis of success criteria and CSFs for MICPs, the authors develop codes and group codes into themes through thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is a research method to identify patterns in dataset and provide rich interpretations of different aspects of dataset on the research question (Braun and Victoria, 2006), which has been adopted in studies on factors, such as Perannagari and Chakrabarti (2020) and De Leeuw et al. (2019).…”

“…During the analysis of success criteria and CSFs for MICPs, the authors develop codes and group codes into themes through thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is a research method to identify patterns in dataset and provide rich interpretations of different aspects of dataset on the research question (Braun and Victoria, 2006), which has been adopted in studies on factors, such as Perannagari and Chakrabarti (2020) and De Leeuw et al (2019). To reduce the variance of results from subjectivity in thematic analysis (Galanis, 2018), the authors created and categorized the codes from target articles independently, then shared and discussed the preliminary outputs until reaching a consensus (Goel et al, 2020).…”