Electrochemical Micromachining for Nanofabrication, MEMS and Nanotechnology 2015
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-32737-4.00007-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influencing Factors of EMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, gap has some obstacles such as monitoring and controlling, especially in freeform surface machining. 31 Figure 4(b) shows the effect of gap on the MRR and as seen as MRR decreases with the increased gap that validates the literature. 32 Smaller gap distance has advantages such as high MRR, but it has disadvantages such as sludge removal and increased electrolyte temperature additionally, electrolyte temperature increasing causes bubbles generating and inhomogeneous material removal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, gap has some obstacles such as monitoring and controlling, especially in freeform surface machining. 31 Figure 4(b) shows the effect of gap on the MRR and as seen as MRR decreases with the increased gap that validates the literature. 32 Smaller gap distance has advantages such as high MRR, but it has disadvantages such as sludge removal and increased electrolyte temperature additionally, electrolyte temperature increasing causes bubbles generating and inhomogeneous material removal.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%