2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influenza A virus production in a single-use orbital shaken bioreactor with ATF or TFF perfusion systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After infection, perfusion was interrupted for approximately 1 h to allow for virus entry. In the first experiment, the CSPR was maintained after infection, similarly to previous studies (Genzel et al, 2014;Coronel et al, 2019a), which resulted in perfusion rates of 0.6-2.0 day −1 (IS1) in this case. In the following cultivations, a constant perfusion rate of 2 day −1 was used after infection to allow for a shorter residence time of the virions inside the bioreactor.…”
Section: Perfusion Bioreactor Cultivationssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After infection, perfusion was interrupted for approximately 1 h to allow for virus entry. In the first experiment, the CSPR was maintained after infection, similarly to previous studies (Genzel et al, 2014;Coronel et al, 2019a), which resulted in perfusion rates of 0.6-2.0 day −1 (IS1) in this case. In the following cultivations, a constant perfusion rate of 2 day −1 was used after infection to allow for a shorter residence time of the virions inside the bioreactor.…”
Section: Perfusion Bioreactor Cultivationssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Imaging flow cytometry was used to determine the fraction of cells infected with IAV. Samples were processed as described previously (Frensing et al, 2016;Coronel et al, 2019a). Therefore, samples containing 2 × 10 6 cells were collected during virus production phase.…”
Section: Virus Titrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cell culture-based platform has been established as a viable alternative for the manufacturing of in uenza vaccines, particularly advantageous in case of a pandemic, due to its exibility, scalability and lower potential constraints of egg shortages (Harding and Heaton 2018; Milian and Kamen 2015). Particularly, the lately developed disposable equipment enables the fast and handy manufacturing of in uenza vaccines (Coronel et al 2019). Various continuous cell lines have been characterized for the propagation of in uenza viruses, such as HEK293, Vero, PER.C6, EB66, PBG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%