2013
DOI: 10.1080/19485565.2013.833816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influenza as a Proportion of Pneumonia Mortality: United States, 1959–2009

Abstract: As causes of death, influenza and pneumonia are typically analyzed together. We quantify influenza’s contribution to the combined pneumonia and influenza mortality time series for the United States, 1959–2009. A key statistic is I/(P+I), the proportion of pneumonia and influenza mortality accounted for by influenza. Year-to-year, I/(P+I) is highly variable and shows long-term decline. Extreme values of I/(P+I) are associated with extreme P+I death rates and vice-versa, but I/(P+I) is a weak predictor of P+I mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, an advantage is that it could be applied to the tropics, where influenza circulation is more haphazard (see, e.g., Aungkulanon et al 2015), and therefore the colinearity of flu season and 'winter' is neither an appropriate identification strategy nor a lurking problem. Using nominal influenza mortality as an instrument instead of the seasons is another possibility, but it is not without its problems (Noymer and Nguyen 2013). Our results are broadly consistent with other seasonal analyses of mortality in the United States, going back to Rosenwaike (1966), as well as more recent work (Feinstein 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, an advantage is that it could be applied to the tropics, where influenza circulation is more haphazard (see, e.g., Aungkulanon et al 2015), and therefore the colinearity of flu season and 'winter' is neither an appropriate identification strategy nor a lurking problem. Using nominal influenza mortality as an instrument instead of the seasons is another possibility, but it is not without its problems (Noymer and Nguyen 2013). Our results are broadly consistent with other seasonal analyses of mortality in the United States, going back to Rosenwaike (1966), as well as more recent work (Feinstein 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…On the other hand, an influenza infection could trigger a wide spectrum of secondary complications, such as bacterial infections, heart disease, or kidney and diabetes complications, among others (Simonsen et al 2011), and many deaths primarily due to influenza infections may be wrongly attributed to another cause. Previous analyses of U.S. death certificates confirm that reports of influenza as a standalone cause of death are not to be trusted and should be regrouped first with other causes of death prior its estimation and analysis (Noymer and Nguyen 2013). Given that our purpose is to specifically account for APC effects on influenza mortality, and not to precisely estimate general influenza mortality levels, we estimated the Serfling models based on the restricted P&I cause-of-death category.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 However, as documented in other studies, 41,42 this could be potentially due to variation in coding practice across countries (e.g., respiratory diseases more or less likely to be coded as the underlying cause of death among patients with multiple chronic conditions) rather than a true difference in etiology of deaths or the consequences of influenza virus infections on mortality in different places. 43 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%