2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influenza vaccination of recommended adult populations, U.S., 1989–2005

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
91
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
9
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15,[29][30][31] Following publication of USPSTF recommendations regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, there was only a small decrease of 3 % in screening 2 years later. 32 Additionally, despite the 2003 USPSTF recommendation that women receive combined Pap smear and human papillomavirus testing no more than once every 3 years and that average risk women cease Pap testing at age 65, annual testing remains common among women over age 65.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,[29][30][31] Following publication of USPSTF recommendations regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, there was only a small decrease of 3 % in screening 2 years later. 32 Additionally, despite the 2003 USPSTF recommendation that women receive combined Pap smear and human papillomavirus testing no more than once every 3 years and that average risk women cease Pap testing at age 65, annual testing remains common among women over age 65.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] We found that H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccination coverage was only 26.3% and 47.6%, respectively, among adults with high-risk conditions. Vaccination coverage varied by state and specific types of high-risk conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Reasons for this might include a lesser emphasis on vaccination of this population compared with children; lack of preexisting relationship of state immunization programs with providers who serve adults at high risk; difficulty in implementing a riskcondition-based recommendation for persons in this high-risk group; many high-risk patients do not consider themselves as high risk, which means targeted messages are not getting through to them; historically low seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in this population 1,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18 ; and the vaccines for children program (a federally funded program that provides vaccines at no cost to children aged ≤18 years who might not otherwise be vaccinated because of inability to pay) might help improve vaccination coverage among children. 19,20 Several ongoing programs or disease-related professional organizations have put in great efforts to improve influenza vaccination among persons with high-risk conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Notably, immunization uptake among pregnant women lacking contraindication remains suboptimal (at rates estimated to be 50%) for inactivated seasonal influenza, and tetanus and diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccination. [6][7][8] As the influenza vaccination rate has stabilized over the past four years following the introduction of the H1N1 vaccine (over the previous 15% influenza vaccine coverage rate), they call attention to the fact that it is unlikely that the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% coverage among this population will be attained. 9 The situation is even more concerning for Tdap with an estimated baseline uptake in 2011 of 3% among pregnant women and a broader need to promote Tdap "cocooning" immunization strategies among close contacts of infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%