Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005050.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influenza vaccines for preventing coronary heart disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[259] A 2008 Cochrane review of vaccine effects on patients with coronary heart disease included 2 trials and concluded that the small numbers of outcomes of interest, such as cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, resulted in imprecise estimates and insufficient data to evaluate this association. [10] Compared to healthy populations, vaccine performance may be decreased in populations with underlying respiratory and/or cardiovascular diseases, and meta-analyses indicate that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that vaccines are adequately effective in these groups. A 2003-04 case control study of high risk (with reported underlying medical conditions) and non-high risk 50-64 year olds found a decreased vaccine efficacy against laboratory confirmed influenza among high risk compared to non-high risk individuals (48% vs. 60%).…”
Section: Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[259] A 2008 Cochrane review of vaccine effects on patients with coronary heart disease included 2 trials and concluded that the small numbers of outcomes of interest, such as cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, resulted in imprecise estimates and insufficient data to evaluate this association. [10] Compared to healthy populations, vaccine performance may be decreased in populations with underlying respiratory and/or cardiovascular diseases, and meta-analyses indicate that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that vaccines are adequately effective in these groups. A 2003-04 case control study of high risk (with reported underlying medical conditions) and non-high risk 50-64 year olds found a decreased vaccine efficacy against laboratory confirmed influenza among high risk compared to non-high risk individuals (48% vs. 60%).…”
Section: Disease Burdenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Although several observational studies, as well as two randomized controlled trials, 10,11 suggest a positive effect of influenza vaccine in preventing acute myocardial infarction, they provide insufficient and conflicting evidence. 12 The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between influenza or pneumococcal vaccination and acute myocardial infarction. registered with a general practitioner, and all health care attendances are recorded in the database.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In addition, randomized controlled trials provide some evidence that influenza vaccination may reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. 8 The pathophysiology of this effect is not understood. Both clinically defined influenzalike illness and community-acquired pneumonia are associated with significant rates of cardiac complications, 9 and the association with influenza may be specific to infection, or some types of infection, rather than influenza itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Cochrane review concluded that there are insufficient data to draw firm conclusions on the effect of vaccination in preventing cardiac complications. 8 …”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%