2021
DOI: 10.1108/dlp-03-2021-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infodemic surrounding COVID-19: Can LIS students recognize and categorize “problematic information” types on social media?

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate Library and Information Science (LIS) students’ understanding of infodemic and related terminologies and their ability to categorize COVID-19-related problematic information types using examples from social media platforms. Design/methodology/approach The participants of this study were LIS students from a public-funded university located at the south coast of Bangladesh. An online survey was conducted which, in addition to demographic and study information… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Gu and Feng (2021), a comprehensive literacy that combines both scientific literacy and information literacy is required for the understanding of and the capacity to use information effectively in this COVID-19 pandemic. Yesmin and Ahmed (2021), however, found that even library and information science students had a poor understanding of COVID-19-related problematic information on social media.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Gu and Feng (2021), a comprehensive literacy that combines both scientific literacy and information literacy is required for the understanding of and the capacity to use information effectively in this COVID-19 pandemic. Yesmin and Ahmed (2021), however, found that even library and information science students had a poor understanding of COVID-19-related problematic information on social media.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is most likely that the pandemic has shifted the way students interact, seek and use information. While there are some recent studies on COVID-19 and students in the context of Bangladesh, for example, can LIS students assess the problematic information (Yesmin and Ahmed, 2022); social media use of university students in Bangladesh during COVID-19 (Atikuzzaman, 2022); and measuring depression and anxiety among the university students during the COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh (Islam et al, 2020), none of these studies COVID-19 pandemic empirically examined the information-seeking behavior of the university students in the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the present study largely focused on the changes of using information sources before the COVID-19 and during the pandemic time. There have been very few studies in the context of Bangladesh which are limited by research areas, for DLP 39,2 example, vaccine hesitancy (Mahmud et al, 2021); problematic information during the pandemic time (Yesmin and Ahmed, 2022); and use of social media in COVID-19 times (Atikuzzaman, 2022). However, none of these previous studies in Bangladesh did focus on students' information need, sources and its changes overtimes, challenges they face and rate of understanding to examine the information sources in the pandemic time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology adoption in libraries is very vital to keep them relevant to the present age of the digital revolution, where the concept of a library waiting for the user to come has dramatically altered. Now libraries are coming into the user space, where they spend much of their time via social media applications and encourage their participation in resource management ( Yesmin and Ahmed, 2022; Mensah and Onyancha, 2021). Every year, academic libraries, in particular, have witnessed that the emerging technologies are more deeply embedded in their service components to facilitate user involvement (De Sarkar, 2017; Coghill, 2018; Anna and Mannan, 2020; Nitecki and Alter, 2021; Okunlaya et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%