2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informal care and health care use of older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
458
4
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(487 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
18
458
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Death of the care recipient serves as a sorting variable that allows us to compare health effects of caregivers who are still caregiving, caregivers who have stopped caregiving, and non-caregivers who have also experienced the death of a parent. To examine the effects of the initial selection into caregiving, we use sibling characteristics as instrumental variables, as has been done in the current literature focusing on the cross-section (Ettner 1995;Stern 1995;Heidemann & Stern 1999;Engers & Stern 2002;Holmes & Van Houtven 2002;Van Houtven & Norton 2004;Charles & Sevak 2005;Heitmuller 2007). By controlling for selection in and out of caregiving, this ensures that any observed health effects are not simply bereavement effects but can be attributed to caregiving, and will help ensure that our estimates are free of endogeneity bias or compounding factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Death of the care recipient serves as a sorting variable that allows us to compare health effects of caregivers who are still caregiving, caregivers who have stopped caregiving, and non-caregivers who have also experienced the death of a parent. To examine the effects of the initial selection into caregiving, we use sibling characteristics as instrumental variables, as has been done in the current literature focusing on the cross-section (Ettner 1995;Stern 1995;Heidemann & Stern 1999;Engers & Stern 2002;Holmes & Van Houtven 2002;Van Houtven & Norton 2004;Charles & Sevak 2005;Heitmuller 2007). By controlling for selection in and out of caregiving, this ensures that any observed health effects are not simply bereavement effects but can be attributed to caregiving, and will help ensure that our estimates are free of endogeneity bias or compounding factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receipt of informal care reduces the probability of or delays nursing home entry. [96][97][98] However, the findings on the relationship between informal care and paid home care are mixed. Some researchers predict that informal care and paid home care are substitutes, 98,99 whereas others find no significant effects.…”
Section: Future Research Opportunities and Policy Implications Researmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[96][97][98] However, the findings on the relationship between informal care and paid home care are mixed. Some researchers predict that informal care and paid home care are substitutes, 98,99 whereas others find no significant effects. 100 We explored controlling for the use of formal caregiving in our regression model but did not find that adding this variable changed our results.…”
Section: Future Research Opportunities and Policy Implications Researmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these studies, La Sasso and Johnson (2002) find that frequent help from dependents' children reduces the probability of needing nursing home care within two years by 60 percent. Van Houtven and Norton (2004) use the dependent's number of children and whether the eldest child is female as instruments to estimate the substitutability between formal and informal care. Overall, their results, based on a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized people over 70 years old in the US, confirm substitutability between formal and informal care, except for postoutpatient surgery care.…”
Section: What Constitutes Ltc?mentioning
confidence: 99%