2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informal care and long-term labor market outcomes

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
46
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This would require reducing significantly our sample size, with a risk of selection bias. Second, the exogeneity of the child's economic situation is a source of concern because income and wealth are likely to be affected by the trade-off between informal care involvement and labor market participation (Heitmueller & Inglis, 2007;Schmitz & Westphal, 2017;Van Houtven et al, 2013). To investigate how economic background affects the ATE, we conduct an additional analysis reducing our sample to individuals who participated in retrospective SHARE surveys (Wave 3 or 7).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Additional Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would require reducing significantly our sample size, with a risk of selection bias. Second, the exogeneity of the child's economic situation is a source of concern because income and wealth are likely to be affected by the trade-off between informal care involvement and labor market participation (Heitmueller & Inglis, 2007;Schmitz & Westphal, 2017;Van Houtven et al, 2013). To investigate how economic background affects the ATE, we conduct an additional analysis reducing our sample to individuals who participated in retrospective SHARE surveys (Wave 3 or 7).…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis and Additional Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the design of LTC policies, it is not only crucial to understand their effects on the health outcomes of the elderly but also its impact on informal caregivers, which might result in positive or negative labor supply effects. Informal caregivers who drop out of the labor force face income losses and have reduced chances of finding employment or getting promotions (Skira, 2015;Schmitz & Westphal, 2017). From a budgetary perspective, negative labor supply effects can severely reduce the comparative cost advantage of informal over formal care arrangements because they directly affect tax payments and contributions to the social security system (Geyer, Haan, & Korfhage, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related branch of literature relying on instrumental variables estimates direct labor supply effects of informal care. Carmichael and Charles (1998), Carmichael and Charles (2003a), Carmichael and Charles (2003b), Heitmueller (2007) and Schmitz and Westphal (2017) are prominent examples who all confirm a negative causal impact of care activities on gainful employment.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%