2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1776648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informal Insurance Arrangements with Limited Commitment: Theory and Evidence from Village Economies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
155
1
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
155
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…If they take finitely many values, the equilibrium can be characterized by a finite system of equations, it can typically be computed easily and, one can conduct local comparative statics using the implicit function theorem. Ligon et al (2002) show that in limited enforcement models finite support equilibria always exist if there are two agents. However, in those models equilibrium allocations are constrained efficient and can be obtained as the solution of a convex programming problem.…”
Section: Stationarity Properties Of Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If they take finitely many values, the equilibrium can be characterized by a finite system of equations, it can typically be computed easily and, one can conduct local comparative statics using the implicit function theorem. Ligon et al (2002) show that in limited enforcement models finite support equilibria always exist if there are two agents. However, in those models equilibrium allocations are constrained efficient and can be obtained as the solution of a convex programming problem.…”
Section: Stationarity Properties Of Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We refer for convenience in what follows to these models as "limited enforcement models". As shown in Kehoe and Levine (2001), Ligon et al (2002), and Alvarez and Jermann (2000), these models are quite tractable since competitive equilibria can be written as the solution to a planner's problem subject to appropriate constraints. Even though this is not true in the environment considered here -the limited commitment constraint has a different nature and we show that competitive equilibria may be constrained inefficient -tractability is still obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fafchamps (2001) discusses the persistence of inequality and patronage linked to risk-sharing arrangements. Another part of the theory literature has been on the nature and sustainability of (partial or complete) risk-sharing arrangements given the lack of formal enforcement (Coate and Ravallion 1993, Platteau 1997, Ligon et al 2001, Attanasio and Rios-Rull 2000. Ligon et al (2001) show evidence that the constrained risk-sharing model fits the ICRISAT-data for India better.…”
Section: Informal Risk-sharing and Safety Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, if some households in the network have access to a new source of risk reduction or protection, then the arrangement may come under pressure. Sometimes renegotiating the reciprocal arrangement may allow the arrangement to continue, albeit on other terms; alternatively, the arrangement may break down (Platteau 1997, Ligon et al 2001). …”
Section: Informal Risk-sharing and Safety Netsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited Commitment. Finally, we turn our attention to another dynamic model, but one in which the relevant friction is limited commitment, as in Kocherlakota (1996) or Ligon et al (2002), and discussed at length in Platteau (1997). In this model, households make risk-sharing arrangements, but the institutions to enforce these contracts are missing or imperfect, so that any household can choose to renege on the mutual insurance arrangement ex post.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%