2018
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informal work in Poland – a regional approach

Abstract: In our paper we try to combine the theories explaining the prevalence of informal work, using a regional approach. Reviewing the literature, we observe that, there is no evidence to confirm that the relationships that occur in cross‐country comparisons remain significant when we use regional data and analyse cross‐regional variations. Our general question is therefore whether there is simply more informal work in less‐developed regions, as the modernization theory asserts. Our analysis concludes that there is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further analysis of the GWR explores and explains why this spatial structuring is observed. It also occurred that sickness absence is associated with certain unobserved (hidden) regional patterns towards the spatial directional distribution of the process determinants (i.e., informal work, European labor law, the level of socioeconomic development, or the spread of diseases in the surrounding areas) [68,69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further analysis of the GWR explores and explains why this spatial structuring is observed. It also occurred that sickness absence is associated with certain unobserved (hidden) regional patterns towards the spatial directional distribution of the process determinants (i.e., informal work, European labor law, the level of socioeconomic development, or the spread of diseases in the surrounding areas) [68,69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…417-431;Sobiechowska-Ziegert & Mikulska, 2013, pp. 200-209), informal work (Nikulin & Sobiechowska-Ziegert, 2018, pp. 1127-1246, innovation (Balcerzak & Pietrzak, 2017a, pp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%