Informality and survival in Ukraine's nuclear landscape: Living with the risks of Chernobyl

Abstract

Recent debates on informal economic activities have partially switched away from a pure monetary logic towards a more complex one, embedded in long term relations and reckoning with non materialistic paradigms. The role of informality in certain aspects of people's lives has however, remained largely unexplored. This article uncovers what happens when the state retires from (providing benefits and social services to) a geographic area and what kind of mechanisms, practices and institutions are created to make up for this. We suggest that, in the face of de facto abandonment by state welfare, and the absence of a private sector alternative, a myriad of transactions and actors can make up for this by replacing these forms of welfare informally. Our case study focuses on the nuclear landscapes around the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in north–central Ukraine as we reveal the ways the excluded and abandoned, which we frame as post-nuclear “bare life” (Agamben, 1998), have created a mechanism of social security that is independent from the state and yet complements it. Informal, local and unofficial understandings of nuclear spaces are central to survival in this marginalised and risky environment.

Drivers behind widespread informal payments in the Romanian public health care system: From tolerance to corruption to socio‐economic and spatial patterns

“…p.167 Stepurko et al p.428 examine the public perception toward informal payments in 6 Central and Eastern European countries (Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Ukraine), observing that “despite the overall public support for the eradication of informal patient payments, around half of sample in each country perceives these payments as inevitable due to the low funding of public care sector”. Another recent study showed that informal payments in‐kind (by gift giving) cannot be seen as benevolent, voluntary actions, but rather as forced ones, negatively affecting equity and welfare support.…”

Toxic Space and Time: Slow Violence, Necropolitics, and Petrochemical Pollution

“…The frequent absence of a cohesive sovereign authority in cases of dispersed environmental risk makes applying such theorizations to pollution more difficult. Although the "deferred causalities" (Nixon 2011, 61) of slow violence could, for example, be framed as postpollution homo sacer (Agamben 1998;see Davies 2013see Davies , 2015Davies and Polese 2015), without a sovereign authority administering the violence, this biopolitical rendering falls flat.…”

Environmental justice in the age of big data: challenging toxic blind spots of voice, speed, and expertise

“…Many scholars have emphasized the importance of lay or local knowledge (Frickel et al 2010;Corburn 2005;Wynne 1996;Davies and Polese 2015), as either a complement or a challenge to official expert knowledge. The role of experts within environmental justice movements has typically been to lend scientific, legal, and economic legitimacy to residents' claims.…”