2007
DOI: 10.1201/9780849304132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informants and Undercover Investigations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, systematic research programs focusing on the relation between EFT and true/false intent might generate knowledge useful for outlining theoretically based interview protocols in order to increase lie catchers' ability to discriminate between true and false intentions. It is safe to argue that such knowledge could be highly important in many different domains; investigative, security and intelligence settings to mention a few (Andrew, Aldrich, & Wark, 2009; Fitzgerald, 2008). In fact, the practical value of such interview protocols and strategies can probably not be overstated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, systematic research programs focusing on the relation between EFT and true/false intent might generate knowledge useful for outlining theoretically based interview protocols in order to increase lie catchers' ability to discriminate between true and false intentions. It is safe to argue that such knowledge could be highly important in many different domains; investigative, security and intelligence settings to mention a few (Andrew, Aldrich, & Wark, 2009; Fitzgerald, 2008). In fact, the practical value of such interview protocols and strategies can probably not be overstated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature on intelligence includes writings on the recruitment of informants (e.g., Fitzgerald, ); the classification of informants (e.g., Palmiotto, ); and the analysing of intelligence (e.g., George & Bruce, ). We have not, however, identified any literature that provides a systematic comparison of various techniques for eliciting intelligence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are too many classifications (the outside multiple-event informant, 'the snoopy'/the inside multiple-event informer, 'the supergrass' (Greer, 1995b: 510)), typologies (based on the informer's operation as a 'snitch,' a 'double-self' or a 'wholly false self', depending on the needs of the police (Levinson 1982: 30-31)), and labels (depending on the informers' intervention in different types of crimes): car theft (Parker, 1986); drugs (Lawler, 1986); corruption (Grabosky, 1991); conspiracy (Haglund, 1990); organised crime (Parker, 1986;Schuberg, 1992); vice and burglary (Skolnick, 1975); vice and liquor activities (Temby, 1991); and certain violent political crimes (Weyrauch, 1986). There are studies about the value of informants (Bennet & Hess, 1994;Hoffman & Riley, 1995); methods for developing informant systems/recruiting (Dunnighan & Norris, 1996;Fitzgerald, 2007); motivational considerations (Billingsley, 2001); compensations (Ferziger & Currell, 1999;Jackson & Fulk, 2005); protection (Boisvert, 2005;Lacko, 2004); abuse (Bloom, 2002); corruption (Clark, 2001); process deviance (Billingsley, 2004); and the management of the informer (Nugent et al, 1991). In fact, the literature has given much attention to the importance of the police informer management and control system (Maguire & John, 1995;Settle, 1995;Williamson & Bagshaw, 2001), from the legal aspects (Harney & Cross, 1968) to informal 'mechanisms' (Lee, 1993;Reuter, 1983) and the ethical dilemmas (Dunnighan & Norris, 1998).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the literature has given much attention to the importance of the police informer management and control system (Maguire & John, 1995;Settle, 1995;Williamson & Bagshaw, 2001), from the legal aspects (Harney & Cross, 1968) to informal 'mechanisms' (Lee, 1993;Reuter, 1983) and the ethical dilemmas (Dunnighan & Norris, 1998). The informal 'mechanisms' used by handlers in their dealings with informers is one of the dominant themes in the field, to the point that taxonomies from different perspectives have been proposed (Fitzgerald, 2007;Mallory, 2000).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%