2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10900-021-00970-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information About COVID-19 Testing on College Websites in the New York City Metropolitan Area

Abstract: The continuing COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the Fall reopening plans among institutions of higher education (IHEs) in the United States (U.S.). While recommendations were made to conduct COVID-19 testing of students and staff, it is unclear as to what extent IHEs were able to engage in testing. IHEs also play a critical role in provision of accurate information related to COVID-19 to students and staff. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess available information on COVID-19 testin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, during this unparalleled time with few guidelines for operating large and small institutions, IHEs developed different communication strategies. For example, a cross-sectional study found that larger institutions (>10,000 students) were more likely than smaller institutions (≤5000 students) to provide information on how to make an appointment for COVID-19 testing [ 7 ]. Moreover, IHEs in the New York City metropolitan area did not provide information on COVID-19 testing in a uniform and comprehensive fashion, which could have contributed to public confusion on testing [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, during this unparalleled time with few guidelines for operating large and small institutions, IHEs developed different communication strategies. For example, a cross-sectional study found that larger institutions (>10,000 students) were more likely than smaller institutions (≤5000 students) to provide information on how to make an appointment for COVID-19 testing [ 7 ]. Moreover, IHEs in the New York City metropolitan area did not provide information on COVID-19 testing in a uniform and comprehensive fashion, which could have contributed to public confusion on testing [ 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a cross-sectional study found that larger institutions (>10,000 students) were more likely than smaller institutions (≤5000 students) to provide information on how to make an appointment for COVID-19 testing [ 7 ]. Moreover, IHEs in the New York City metropolitan area did not provide information on COVID-19 testing in a uniform and comprehensive fashion, which could have contributed to public confusion on testing [ 7 ]. Within the context of the evolving pandemic, the communication of relevant information from IHEs was instrumental in adherence to NPI [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a cross-sectional study found larger institutions (> 10, 000 students) were more likely than smaller institutions (≤ 5000 students) to provide information on how to make an appointment for COVID-19 testing [7]. Moreover, IHEs in the New York City (NYC) metropolitan area did not provide information on COVID-19 testing in a uniform and comprehensive fashion, which could have contributed to public confusion on testing [7]. Within the context of the evolving pandemic, communication of relevant information from IHEs can be instrumental in adherence to NPI [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, during this unparalleled time with few guidelines for operating large and small institutions, IHEs developed different communication strategies. For example, a cross-sectional study found larger institutions (> 10, 000 students) were more likely than smaller institutions (≤ 5000 students) to provide information on how to make an appointment for COVID-19 testing [7]. Moreover, IHEs in the New York City (NYC) metropolitan area did not provide information on COVID-19 testing in a uniform and comprehensive fashion, which could have contributed to public confusion on testing [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%