Information about secondary prevention in coronary patients: a comparison between Italian and Brazilian Application of MICRO-Q Questionnaire

Abstract

Results: The analysis of mean total scores of Italian and Brazilian applications showed statistically significant differences for correct answers (p<0.001) and for 'don't know' answers (p<0.001). 18 statements had significant (p<0.005) differences between applications in the two countries.Conclusion: Despite differences between Italy and Brazil, the analysis of MICRO-Q applications showed a similar mean score percent of correct answers, indicating enough knowledge about secondary prevention of CHD.