2021
DOI: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1937473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) critique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An improved understanding of the challenges and opportunities that ICTs pose for women MSME entrepreneurs is an important step towards bridging the gender digital divide and transforming it into digital opportunity. The current study reflects a major critique of Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) research, which often discusses the operation of processes and agents of digitalisation without giving salience to local conditions and culture (Schelenz and Pawelec 2021). This study is aimed to understand and address some of these challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved understanding of the challenges and opportunities that ICTs pose for women MSME entrepreneurs is an important step towards bridging the gender digital divide and transforming it into digital opportunity. The current study reflects a major critique of Information and Communication Technologies for Development (ICT4D) research, which often discusses the operation of processes and agents of digitalisation without giving salience to local conditions and culture (Schelenz and Pawelec 2021). This study is aimed to understand and address some of these challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observe that it is us who will em-power marginalised communities by introducing our disruptive language technologies (Joshi et al, 2019), while unwittingly reinforcing the centralperipheral model (cf. Schelenz and Pawelec, 2022).…”
Section: Poverty-conscious Language Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ICT agriculture that simply follows traditional extension approaches cannot be transformative in the aspects of equity and inclusiveness. Instead, it risks reinforcing existing gaps by disadvantaging marginalized social groups especially women who are in fact the majority of smallholders in the global South (Hargittai, 2018;O'Donnell & Sweetman, 2018;Schelenz & Pawelec, 2022). ICT interventions for women need to be adjusted according to their specific needs, interests and capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%