1991
DOI: 10.2307/2938286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information and Timing in Repeated Partnerships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
198
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are related to the findings of Abreu, Milgrom, and Pearce (1991), who study a continuously repeated prisoner's dilemma with imperfect monitoring. In that model, lengthening the period over which actions are held fixed increases the possibilities for cooperation, expanding the set of feasible equilibrium payoffs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are related to the findings of Abreu, Milgrom, and Pearce (1991), who study a continuously repeated prisoner's dilemma with imperfect monitoring. In that model, lengthening the period over which actions are held fixed increases the possibilities for cooperation, expanding the set of feasible equilibrium payoffs.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Similarly, in a model of commodity money with infrequent search, the fact that strategies are held fixed for an entire period is a key feature that drives the large multiplicity of equilibria. While the game studied by Abreu, Milgrom, and Pearce (1991) is purely a game of coordination, the Kiyotaki and Wright (1989) model is an anonymous sequential game (see Jovanovic and Rosenthal (1988)) in which strategic concerns play no role.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second condition (2) is useful here to exclude this possibility: such learning does not occur in equilibrium. Then it turns out that the binding constraint is with respect to the one-period deviation in the first period as in Abreu, Milgrom and Pearce [1]. Note that the deviation gain from such one-period deviation is in the order of 1 T compared to the total payoff of the T-period game.…”
Section: Proof First Note Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conditional independence is a nongeneric assumption. 1 Furthermore, it is difficult to introduce even a slight correlation of private signals. This is because T must go to infinity to obtain the exact folk theorem, hence players may be able to obtain a large amount of information from their accumulated private signals even if each signal has a limited information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One might argue that the firms cannot credibly refuse to transact; in the event of termination, they would renegotiate the relational contract to generate some ongoing profit. The economics literature on repeated games with imperfect monitoring is subject to the same criticism that in a punishment phase, the players have an incentive to renegotiate to a more favorable continuation equilibrium; see, for example, Abreu et al (1986Abreu et al ( , 1991. Laboratory experiments in a repeated trust game conducted by Schweitzer et al (2005) suggest that the degree to which cooperation can be restored following a breakdown in the relationship depends on whether the breakdown is accompanied by deliberate, visible deception.…”
Section: Derivation Of An Optimal Relational Contractmentioning
confidence: 99%