Information Blocking: Is It Occurring and What Policy Strategies Can Address It?

Abstract

Congress has expressed concern about electronic health record (EHR) vendors and health care providers knowingly interfering with the electronic exchange of patient health information. These “information blocking” practices would privately benefit vendors and providers but limit the societal quality and efficiency benefits from EHR adoption. We found that information blocking is reported to frequently occur among EHR vendors as well as hospitals and health systems, and that it is perceived to be motivated by opportunities for revenue gain. Because information blocking is largely legal today, the most effective policy response likely involves a combination of direct enforcement and the altering of market conditions that promote information blocking. Context Congress has raised concerns about providers and electronic health record (EHR) vendors knowingly engaging in business practices that interfere with electronic health information exchange (HIE). Such “information blocking” is presumed to occur because providers and vendors reap financial benefits, but these practices harm public good and substantially limit the value to be gained from EHR adoption. Crafting a policy response has been difficult because, beyond anecdotes, there is no data that captures the extent of information blocking. Methods We conducted a national survey of leaders of HIE efforts who work to enable HIE across provider organizations. We asked them about the frequency of information blocking, its specific forms, and the effectiveness of various policy strategies to address it. We received responses from 60 individuals (57% response rate). We calculated descriptive statistics across responses. Findings Half of respondents reported that EHR vendors routinely engage in information blocking, and 25% of respondents reported that hospitals and health systems routinely do so. Among EHR vendors, the most common form of information blocking was deploying products with limited interoperability. Among hospitals and health systems, the most common form was coercing providers to adopt particular EHR or HIE technology. Increasing transparency of EHR vendor business practices and product performance, stronger financial incentives for providers to share information, and making information blocking illegal were perceived as the most effective policy remedies. Conclusions Information blocking appears to be real and fairly widespread. Policymakers have some existing levers that can be used to curb information blocking and help information flow to where it is needed to improve patient care. However, because information blocking is largely legal today, a strong response will involve new legislation and associated enforcement actions.

Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects

“…The biggest roadblock for data sharing is the treatment of data as a commodity that can provide a competitive advantage. Therefore, sometimes both providers and vendors intentionally interfere with the flow of information to block the information flow between different EHR systems [31].…”

Key Factors Affecting Ambulatory Care Providers’ Electronic Exchange of Health Information With Affiliated and Unaffiliated Partners: Web-Based Survey Study (Preprint)

“…Deliberate "information blocking" practices by EHR vendors and providers where they knowingly interfere with electronic exchange of health information for competitive purposes can also impede HIE use [31]. Ambulatory clinics could be coerced into implementing systems and document exchange practices by larger providers or vendors [32]. Recent Federal efforts aimed at implementing and improving interoperability standards are moving in the right direction to promote HIE use by clinical providers.…”

Natural Language Processing and Its Implications for the Future of Medication Safety: A Narrative Review of Recent Advances and Challenges

“…In a national survey of leaders in health information exchange, 50% of leaders reported that their EHR vendor participated in blocking practices, preventing appropriate information exchange. 70 Integration of the problem opioid users with a prescription opioid database/monitoring system may help further increase the utility of NLP. 49 Another concern that remains is that of security with regard to de-identification of data for data sharing.…”