2021
DOI: 10.7554/elife.67403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information content differentiates enhancers from silencers in mouse photoreceptors

Abstract: Enhancers and silencers often depend on the same transcription factors (TFs) and are conflated in genomic assays of TF binding or chromatin state. To identify sequence features that distinguish enhancers and silencers, we assayed massively parallel reporter libraries of genomic sequences targeted by the photoreceptor TF CRX in mouse retinas. Both enhancers and silencers contain more TF motifs than inactive sequences, but relative to silencers, enhancers contain motifs from a more diverse collection of TFs. We … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
101
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(217 reference statements)
13
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This SVM-based method has been previously used to highlight specific sequence features in the mouse retinal epigenome and to predict retinal-reporter expression post-hoc. [31][32][33][34] Together these previous studies and our current work demonstrate the potential of this approach to characterize human retinal CRE sequences for the identification of crucial features and their variants. While this approach can be applied to many types of sequencing data, the use of general chromatin accessibility via ATAC-seq allows the model to incorporate the sequence features of diverse regulatory elements in a less biased approach than using more specific ChIP-seq data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This SVM-based method has been previously used to highlight specific sequence features in the mouse retinal epigenome and to predict retinal-reporter expression post-hoc. [31][32][33][34] Together these previous studies and our current work demonstrate the potential of this approach to characterize human retinal CRE sequences for the identification of crucial features and their variants. While this approach can be applied to many types of sequencing data, the use of general chromatin accessibility via ATAC-seq allows the model to incorporate the sequence features of diverse regulatory elements in a less biased approach than using more specific ChIP-seq data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…[28][29][30] This GKM-SVM approach has been applied successfully to predict sequence values in the context of specific mouse retinal enhancers. [31][32][33][34] However, to date, it has not been applied across a wider set of human retinal epigenomic data to perform a comprehensive prediction of CRE variant impact scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SVM-based method has been previously used to highlight specific sequence features in the mouse retinal epigenome and to predict retinal reporter expression post hoc. 34 37 Together these previous studies and our current work demonstrate the potential of this approach to characterize human retinal CRE sequences for the identification of crucial features and their variants. Although this approach can be applied to many types of sequencing data, the use of general chromatin accessibility via ATAC-seq allows the model to incorporate the sequence features of diverse regulatory elements in a less biased approach than using more specific ChIP-seq data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“… 31 33 This GKM-SVM approach has been applied successfully to predict sequence values in the context of specific mouse retinal enhancers. 34 37 However, to date, it has not been applied across a wider set of human retinal epigenomic data to perform a comprehensive prediction of CRE variant impact scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the direction of the bifunctionality (whether the gene gets activated or whether it becomes repressed) might be tuned by the DBD's motif within an enhancer/silencer. Evidence for this hypothesis has been shown for the bifunctionality of the homeodomain TF CRX where observing repression, in addition to activation, depends on the number of CRX binding motifs in a synthetic context or the presence of other TF binding motifs in a genomic context 49,50 . The functional difference between a bifunctional protein's silencer or enhancer sequence might simply be explained by the bifunctionality of the effector domain and the ratio of recruited activating and repressing complexes, where more binding motifs will lead to repression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%