2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1588087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Content of IFRS versus Domestic Accounting Standards: Evidence from Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for now, the value relevance of equity book value during the IFRS convergence are considered as stable. This evidence is tend to support previous studies that find no proof of value relevance improvement attributed to IFRS adoption (Schiebel 2006), Jarva and Lantto (2011)). However, the value relevance of operating cashflow shows a significant incremental for 2009-2011, continued …”
Section: Symultant Value Relevance Of Accounting Information During Tsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for now, the value relevance of equity book value during the IFRS convergence are considered as stable. This evidence is tend to support previous studies that find no proof of value relevance improvement attributed to IFRS adoption (Schiebel 2006), Jarva and Lantto (2011)). However, the value relevance of operating cashflow shows a significant incremental for 2009-2011, continued …”
Section: Symultant Value Relevance Of Accounting Information During Tsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Some researches find value relevance improvement on IFRS based financial statement (Capkun et al, 2008;Devalle et al, 2010;Li and Park 2011). Otherwise, several studies found no value relevance improvement subject to IFRS adoption (Schiebel 2006;Jarva and Lantto 2011).…”
Section: Value Relevance and Ifrs Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, Jarva and Lantto (2012), when analyzing the IFRS vis-à-vis Finnish accounting standards, noted that profits calculated in accordance with the IFRS are less timely, although they marginally provide a higher predictive capability of future cash flows. Furthermore, the authors noted that assets and liabilities under those standards have a lower association with share prices.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International studies, particularly in European countries, have examined this topic and have advanced the understanding of the effects of the adoption of IFRS on accounting information itself and on the users of that information (Ashbaugh & Pincus, 2001;Barth et al, 2008;Garanina & Kormiltseva, 2014;Kargin, 2013;Jarva & Lantto, 2012;Landsman, Maydew, & Thornock, 2012;Soderstrom & Sun, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have reported conflicting results on the value relevance of IFRS. Jarva and Lantto (2012) analysed the information content of financial statements based on IFRS in a mandatory adoption regime in Finland. They found that book values of assets and liabilities measured under IFRS are no more value relevant than they are under Finnish Accounting Standards.…”
Section: Ifrs Adoption and Value Relevance Of Financial Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%