Information Culture and the Archival Record

Lubar, Steven

doi:10.17723/aarc.62.1.30x5657gu1w44630

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Of course, the topic of web archiving has been no stranger to the pages of American Archivist. Examples abound, such as Timothy Arnold and Walker Sampson's collection development practices for topical social media archives; 16 Brewster Kahle's call for "universal access to all knowledge" in the creation of the Internet Archive; 17 Steven Lubar's analysis of the benefits of hypermedia for archival context; 18 and Margaret Hedstrom's framework for research in electronic records that foreshadowed much of the research to come, right at reviews the dawn of the Web. 19 I highlight these here simply to note the diversity and duration of interest that has come from the journal you are reading now and to invite more to come.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review Essay: What We Talk about When We Talk about Archiving the Web

Summers

2020

The American Archivist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review Essay: What We Talk about When We Talk about Archiving the Web

Summers

2020

The American Archivist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Public agencies are requested to increase their publication of open data to the benefit of citizens, companies and organizations. As a consequence, archival management needs to be developed accordingly: "Archives reflect not just technologies (…) but also the changes in culture that accompany changing technology" [56]. Technical solutions and administrative routines should be developed in the light of the existing legal framework and considerations related to costs, legality and efficiency [57], issues which egovernment development aims to support.…”

Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proactivity Postponed? ‘Capturing’ Records Created in the Context of E-government – A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden

Klareld

2015

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part 4: Application Areas and EvaluationInternational audienceProactive records management is often described as a prerequisite for a well-functioning public administration that is efficient, legally secure and democratic. In the context of e-government, official information is seen as a valuable asset, which is why technical solutions are developed to improve accessibility and reusability. Yet how to ‘capture’ and preserve the information is still unclear, and adaptations of routines which have originated in a paper based administration to practices suitable for managing digital records are often lacking. This risks impeding on the work of public agencies, their services toward citizens, and the goals of e-government. This paper uses current plans for developing a national e-archive service in Sweden as a case, applying literary warrant and the records continuum model to discuss how archives management can support the goals of e-government and facilitate proactivity. A special focus is placed on ‘capture’ as a vital part of holistic recordkeeping. The result shows that despite regulations and ambitions supporting proactivity, ‘capture’ is not emphasized as a necessity for using, sharing and preserving official information. This could create archives that are incomplete, and risk contributing to a decline in governmental transparency and openness

show abstract

“…Despite numerous studies of the concept of "information culture", most scientists analyze it from the standpoint of individual sciences, which limits the vision of this phenomenon in modern society. The first attempts to analyze the genesis of information culture, to identify its historical and social conditionality were made in (Curry and Moore, 2003;Khan and Azmi, 2005;Labouitz and Tamm, 1987;Leonhardt, 1988;Lubar, 1999;Metz, 1986;Mordue, 1995;Oliver, 2004;Porter, 1995;Rubanov, 1989;Szecskö, 1986;Travica, 2005;Welsch, 1989;Widén-Wulff, 2000;Zambare, 2003). The formation of information culture at various levels of education were studied in (Abitova et al, 2020;Almazova et al, 2018;Babenko, 2018;Boamah and Salahshour, 2021;Ibashova et al, 2017;Lauri et al, 2021;Lepik and Kannukene, 2018;Mullins, 2019;Virkus and Salman, 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 2: AET

Семеріков¹,

Osadchyi²,

Kuzminska³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology (AET) is a peer-reviewed international conference focusing on research advances and applications of combined use of computer hardware, software, and educational theory and practice to facilitate learning. Today, AET is the premier interdisciplinary forum for learning scientists, academicians, researchers, professionals, policymakers, postgraduate students, and practitioners to present their latest research results, ideas, developments, and applications. AET topics of interest are: • Artificial intelligence in education • Augmented reality in education • Cloud-based learning environments • Cloud technologies for mathematics learning • Cloud technologies for informatics learning • Computer simulation in science and mathematics learning • ICT in primary and secondary education • ICT in higher education • Learning environments • Learning technology • Professional training in the digital space • Massive open online courses • Methodology of informatization in education • Modelling systems in education • Psychological safety in the digital educational environment • Soft skills development • STEM education • Virtualization of learning This volume represents the proceedings of the Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology, held in Kyiv, Ukraine, on November 12-13, 2020. It comprises 110 contributed papers that were carefully peer-reviewed and selected from 282 submissions. Each submission was reviewed by at least 3, and on the average 3.1, program committee members. The accepted papers present a state-of-the-art overview of successful cases and provide guidelines for future research. We are thankful to all the authors who submitted papers and the delegates for their participation and their interest in AET as a platform to share their ideas and innovation. Also, we are also thankful to all the program committee members for providing continuous guidance and efforts taken by peer reviewers contributed to improve the quality of papers provided constructive critical comments, improvements and corrections to the authors are gratefully appreciated for their contribution to the success of the workshop. Moreover, we would like to thank the developers of HotCRP, who made it possible for us to use the resources of this excellent and comprehensive conference management system, from the call of papers and inviting reviewers, to handling paper submissions, communicating with the authors, and creating the volume of the workshop proceedings.

show abstract

Information Culture and the Archival Record

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Review Essay: What We Talk about When We Talk about Archiving the Web

Review Essay: What We Talk about When We Talk about Archiving the Web

Proactivity Postponed? ‘Capturing’ Records Created in the Context of E-government – A Literary Warrant Analysis of the Plans for a National e-archive Service in Sweden

Proceedings of the 1st Symposium on Advances in Educational Technology - Volume 2: AET

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About