Abstract:There are strict guidelines on photoediting in newsrooms, and serious professional repercussions if failing to adhere to these, while computer-generated imagery is increasingly used in other areas of visual communication. This paper presents empirical research on the ability of professional photographers and editors to distinguish photographs from photorealistic computer-generated images by looking at them on a screen. Our results show clearly that those studied (n= 20) are unable to distinguish these from another, suggesting that it is increasingly difficult to make this distinction, particularly since most viewers are not as experienced in photography as those studied. Interestingly, those studied continue to share a conventional understanding of photography, that is not in line with current developments in digital photography and digital image rendering. Based on our findings, we suggest the need for developing a particular visual literacy that understands the computational in digital photography, and grounds the use of digital photography among particular communities of practice. When seeing photographs on screens, journals, exhibitions, or newspapers, we might actually be looking at computer-generated simulations, and vice versa.