2009
DOI: 10.1080/01639260903272778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Literacy and Research-Intensive Graduate Students: Enhancing the Role of Research Librarians

Abstract: This article investigates how psychology graduate students find information for coursework and research, who teaches them how to find it, and whether differences emerge over the course of their graduate careers. Findings indicate that these graduate students are comfortable using campus libraries, prefer electronic resources, ask supervisors when they need assistance locating information, and have some interest in furthering their information literacy knowledge. Finally, the master's students use different inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to research showing that students prefer printed sources, a number of studies, especially those published in the past few years, indicate that students are more inclined to use electronic resources (Agboola, 2010;Harrington, 2009;Holaday, Selvig, Purkiss, & Hortsch, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Pandita, 2012;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Thanuskodi, 2011;U莽ak, 2007). The students emphasize ease of use, search, and access to information (Arya & Talukdar, 2010;Beard, Dale, & Hutchins, 2007;Kandpal et al, 2013;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;U莽ak, 2007), recency of information (Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Shelburne, 2009;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008;U莽ak, 2007), availability of resources (Shelburne, 2009), access to a wide range of information (Beard et al, 2007;Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012), saving time (Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Shelburne, 2009;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008), and reducing costs (Hernon et al, 2007;Ji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to research showing that students prefer printed sources, a number of studies, especially those published in the past few years, indicate that students are more inclined to use electronic resources (Agboola, 2010;Harrington, 2009;Holaday, Selvig, Purkiss, & Hortsch, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;Pandita, 2012;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Thanuskodi, 2011;U莽ak, 2007). The students emphasize ease of use, search, and access to information (Arya & Talukdar, 2010;Beard, Dale, & Hutchins, 2007;Kandpal et al, 2013;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;U莽ak, 2007), recency of information (Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Shelburne, 2009;Sudhier & Seethalekshmi, 2011;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008;U莽ak, 2007), availability of resources (Shelburne, 2009), access to a wide range of information (Beard et al, 2007;Pandita, 2012;Porumbeanu, 2009;Ranganadham & Babu, 2012), saving time (Ranganadham & Babu, 2012;Shelburne, 2009;Sujatha & Mudhol, 2008), and reducing costs (Hernon et al, 2007;Ji et al, 2014).…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, for the effective use of electronic resources it is not enough to have a powerful computer and fast Internet access; it is also necessary to have specific knowledge and skills. Several studies show that students lack such competencies (Agboola, 2010;Boumarafi, 2010;Kahouei, Babamohamadi, Panahi, & Zadeh, 2013;Manda, 2005;Nemati Anaraki & Babalhavaeji, 2013;Yu-Mei & Artero, 2005), and that, despite the existing knowledge and skills, they need additional training (Baro & Fyneman, 2009;Harrington, 2009;Judd & Kennedy, 2011). Language barriers may also prevent students from using electronic resources (Shuling, 2007;Wu & Chen, 2012).…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Electronic Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Marni Harrington found the master's students responding to her survey were more likely than the PhD participants to use bibliographic management tools, and less than half of the survey respondents used a bibliographic management tool at all. 8 Interviews with fifteen Australian researchers determined that just over half used EndNote or a similar tool. 9 While some groups may use these tools more than others, this snapshot of bibliographic management tool use demonstrates that there is a significant opportunity for growth in the adoption and use of these tools regardless of disciplinary area or academic status.…”
Section: Measurements Of Bibliographic Management Tool Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the delivery of library services to research students is not new (Barrett 2005;Cooke et al 2011;Frank et al 2001;Gratch and York 1991;Harrington 2009;Harris 2011;Lee 2004;Moncrieff, Macauley, and Epps 2007;Robertson 2003;Nimon 2002). Yet contrary to the trend of disintermediation (do-it-yourself), the provision of candidate-specific training has increased (Green and Macauley 2007;Jastram and Zawistoski 2008;Korobili, Malliari, and Zapounidou 2011), as has the research on the topic.…”
Section: Introduction and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%