Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Wireless Information, Data, and Communication Technologies 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3231830.3231840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Management Technologies for Big Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Table 1 shows, the selected studies were undertaken in Nigeria ( n = 1), 18 Canada ( n = 4), 12 19 20 21 United States ( n = 6), 22 23 24 25 26 Kenya ( n = 2), 27 28 Iran ( n = 4), 29 30 31 32 Saudi Arabia ( n = 1), 33 China ( n = 1), 34 Tanzania ( n = 1), 35 Ethiopia ( n = 1), 36 Bulgaria ( n = 1), 37 and Australia ( n = 2). 38 39 In terms of research methodology, the use of quantitative methods ( n = 14) 12 18 19 20 21 27 28 31 32 33 34 35 38 39 was more common than qualitative research methods ( n = 7) 22 23 25 26 29 30 37 to assess different data quality dimensions. Two studies used the mixed-methods research approach to assess data quality in health care.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As Table 1 shows, the selected studies were undertaken in Nigeria ( n = 1), 18 Canada ( n = 4), 12 19 20 21 United States ( n = 6), 22 23 24 25 26 Kenya ( n = 2), 27 28 Iran ( n = 4), 29 30 31 32 Saudi Arabia ( n = 1), 33 China ( n = 1), 34 Tanzania ( n = 1), 35 Ethiopia ( n = 1), 36 Bulgaria ( n = 1), 37 and Australia ( n = 2). 38 39 In terms of research methodology, the use of quantitative methods ( n = 14) 12 18 19 20 21 27 28 31 32 33 34 35 38 39 was more common than qualitative research methods ( n = 7) 22 23 25 26 29 30 37 to assess different data quality dimensions. Two studies used the mixed-methods research approach to assess data quality in health care.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree to which data attributes have no conflict and are consistent with other data and their attributes. 37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluating data quality metrics from prospective registries has gained great prominence in the literature in recent years [9 , 10] . Although there is no consensus on the main metrics which should be adopted, the most cited indicators include completeness, accuracy, and temporal plausibility [11] , [12] , [13] .…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluating data quality metrics from prospective registries has gained great prominence in the literature in recent years [9 , 10] . Although there is no consensus on the main metrics which should be adopted, the most cited indicators include completeness, accuracy, and temporal plausibility [11] , [12] , [13] . At the same time, direct data auditing, which involves comparing collected data with primary information sources, has been adopted as an additional strategy to ensure the quality of prospective clinical registries [14 , 15] .…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%