Information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients: within- and between-group agreement of patients and health professionals

Abstract

PurposeThe aims of this study were to analyze agreement on information needs within a group of early-state prostate cancer patients and to compare information preferences of patients with the view of health-care professionals about patients’ needs.MethodsSample consists of patients (n = 128) and six subgroups of health-care professionals (urologists, n = 32; nurses, n = 95; radiotherapy technologists (RTTs), n = 36; medical oncologists, n = 19; radiation oncologists, n = 12; general practitioners (GPs), n = 10). Information needs have been assessed with 92 questions concerning prostate cancer and its treatment. Respondents judged the importance of addressing each question. Within- and between-group agreements of patients and health-care professional groups were estimated with raw agreement indices as well as chance-corrected Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 measures. Finally, group-specific core items rated with high importance as well as high agreement were defined.ResultsPatients rated on average (median) half, i.e., 51 out 92 items as essential (interquartile range (IQR) = 36–66), 26 items as desired (IQR = 14–38), and 10 items as avoidable (IQR = 2–22). Within-group agreement on the presented information topics is modest for any participating group (AC1patients = 0.319; AC1professionals = 0.295–0.398). Agreement between patients and professionals is low too (AC1 = 0.282–0.329). Defining group-specific core sets of information topics results in 51 items being part of at least one core set. Concordance of the item core sets of patients and professionals is moderate with κ = 0.38–0.66, sensitivity of professionals’ core sets for patients’ preferences varies between 56 and 74 %.ConclusionsResults emphasize the need for dialogue between doctor/professional and patient in identifying the information needed by individual patients and support the importance of shared decision making.

Information Needs of Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer When Making Radiation Therapy Decisions

“…17 To ensure an adequate shared decision-making process, these findings highlight the importance of individualized information provision. 17,23 Future decision support tools should provide adequate options for patients to select which information is of interest.…”

Investigation of Cancer Patients’ Information Sources, Information Needs and Expectations of Health Professionals

“…[4] Bu nedenle kanser hastalarının bilgi gereksinimlerini anlayabilmek için iletişim ve hastaların karar vermede desteklenmesi önemlidir. [5] Hastalar sağlık profesyonellerinden olumlu iletişim yanında bakım, destek [6] ve olayların anlayabilecekleri dilde anlatılmasını beklemektedirler. [7] Ayrıca sağlık profesyonelleri bilgi verirken dürüst, merhametli ve empatik olmalı, zaman ayırmalı, dinlemeli, umut vermeli, alternatif tedavi yollarını anlatmalı, güvenilir, bilgili, saygılı, yardımsever ve ulaşılabilir olmalıdır.…”

Information about expert decision and post‐decision distortion of facts of own decision

“…There are also applied applications of the results, for example when experienced and unexperienced doctors make the same or different treatment decisions based on the same information. Also, the results have implications for medical shared decision making when doctors and patients make treatment decisions concerning, for example, breast and prostate cancer (McGuffin, Chau, Di Prospero et al, 2015;R€ uesch, Schaffert, Fischer et al, 2014;Feldman-Stewart et al, 2004, 2005. Even if a patient prefers the same treatment as a doctor, the doctor should spend time discussing the facts with the patient to avoid reference to distorted facts post treatment.…”