2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information, Place, Cyberspace, and Accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents this analogy: the backbone links, which are the highest tier networks of the Internet physical infrastructure symbolize the motorways; the Internet Exchange Points (IXP) and Points of Presence (POP), which are the points where different networks exchange data -a process known as peering -and final users gain access to the global network, represent the transport nodes (interchanges and access nodes); the Metropolitan Access Network (MAN) and the local loops symbolize the intra-city roads; and the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses denote the numerous final destinations in the cities -the Internet real estate according to Dodge and Shiode (2000). The above supports Couclelis and Getis's (2000) findings that recent technological and societal developments require the re-conceptualization of the notion of accessibility at all scales, as ICTs have radically changed and expanded the scope for notions such interaction and accessibility (Janelle & Hodge, 2000). More specifically, Dodge argues about the need to expand the notion of accessibility in order to include notions of information accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 presents this analogy: the backbone links, which are the highest tier networks of the Internet physical infrastructure symbolize the motorways; the Internet Exchange Points (IXP) and Points of Presence (POP), which are the points where different networks exchange data -a process known as peering -and final users gain access to the global network, represent the transport nodes (interchanges and access nodes); the Metropolitan Access Network (MAN) and the local loops symbolize the intra-city roads; and the Internet Protocol (IP) addresses denote the numerous final destinations in the cities -the Internet real estate according to Dodge and Shiode (2000). The above supports Couclelis and Getis's (2000) findings that recent technological and societal developments require the re-conceptualization of the notion of accessibility at all scales, as ICTs have radically changed and expanded the scope for notions such interaction and accessibility (Janelle & Hodge, 2000). More specifically, Dodge argues about the need to expand the notion of accessibility in order to include notions of information accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Exceptions include the rather conceptual, but also empirical, proposals found in the volume edited by Janelle and Hodge (1998) and the graph oriented approach by Wheeler and O'Kelly (1999). The novelty of this paper is the amalgamation of opportunities for virtual interaction and the cost to reach the opportunities in the digital economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, this is one of the main features of the Internet which provides information without any limitation in time and location. The ability to access information easily and quickly is one of the things which people benefit from these days in the so called worldwide information society (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Graham 2004). A further cause is the comparative 'invisibility' of ICT flows (Hillis 1998, Janelle & Hodge 2000: urban scholars seem to be trapped by what Cosgrove (1984, p. 31) and Lowenthal (1961, p. 241) have famously called "the argument of the eye" and the intimate relation between "human logic and optics." Put differently: although ICT is no less important than air travel for the (re)production of inter-city flows, the former infrastructure is somewhat less 'visible' so that urban scholars are perhaps less inclined to make use of ICT-based indicators.…”
Section: Digital and Physical Accessibility In A 'Network Society'mentioning
confidence: 99%