2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-018-9848-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information preserving regression-based tools for statistical disclosure control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 There are many trade-offs between these techniques. 28,29 In the case of record-level data release, applying differential privacy would require employing a large amount of noise to obtain a meaningful privacy guarantee. As a result, the analytical utility of the output would be poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 There are many trade-offs between these techniques. 28,29 In the case of record-level data release, applying differential privacy would require employing a large amount of noise to obtain a meaningful privacy guarantee. As a result, the analytical utility of the output would be poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K-anonymity is used to prevent re-identification of individuals made possible by record linking attacks while the differential privacy provides a probabilistic guarantee that the inclusion of an individual in a data set will not alter the outcome of a query to that data sets [27]. There are many trade-offs between these techniques [28,29]. In the case of record-level data release, applying differential privacy would require employing a large amount of noise to obtain a meaningful privacy guarantee.…”
Section: Plos Digital Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%