Handbook of Second Language Acquisition 1996
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information-Processing Approaches to Research on Second Language Acquisition and Use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Another proposal is that more complex structures may be less likely to be learned than simpler ones because complex structures demand more attention (possibly creating a cognitive overload) in sentence processing and these attentional constraints may have a negative impact on L2 learning (e.g. McLaughlin & Heredia, 1996). Results of empirical studies of attention and the learning of complex versus simple grammatical structures are also divided, arguably owing in part to the lack of consensus in how to conceptualise complexity and also from the inconsistency in its operationalisation (Housen, Pierrard, & Van Daele, 2005;Spada & Tomita, 2010).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another proposal is that more complex structures may be less likely to be learned than simpler ones because complex structures demand more attention (possibly creating a cognitive overload) in sentence processing and these attentional constraints may have a negative impact on L2 learning (e.g. McLaughlin & Heredia, 1996). Results of empirical studies of attention and the learning of complex versus simple grammatical structures are also divided, arguably owing in part to the lack of consensus in how to conceptualise complexity and also from the inconsistency in its operationalisation (Housen, Pierrard, & Van Daele, 2005;Spada & Tomita, 2010).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By means of such automaticity, learners reduce the time pressure and cognitive load (McLaughlin & Heredia, 1996) and thus increase their speaking fluency (Wood, 2001;Wood, 2004;Zhou & Wang, 2007).…”
Section: While-speaking Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are included, however, in the index of the volume edited by Ritchie and Bhatia (1996), referring to the chapter written by McLaughlin and Heredia (1996), quoted in note 12 of this chapter, who use incidental and intentional in their methodological senses. 8 Schmidt (1994b, p. 173) acknowledges the importance that many L2 learners themselves attribute to the incidental learning of grammar rules, but dismisses incidental learning as a viable construct in the explanation of grammar acquisition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%