2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3045472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Risk and the Cost of Equity Capital Revisited: Evidence from the U.S. Property-Casualty Insurance Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is ample evidence that the underwriting side of the P/L insurance business is opaque (see, e.g., Chen et al, 2017; Eckles et al, 2014; Morgan, 2002; Pottier & Sommer, 2006; Zhang et al, 2009). By opacity, we mean that investors have uncertainty about the present value of expected underwriting claims, that is, the economic value of the insurer's liability.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is ample evidence that the underwriting side of the P/L insurance business is opaque (see, e.g., Chen et al, 2017; Eckles et al, 2014; Morgan, 2002; Pottier & Sommer, 2006; Zhang et al, 2009). By opacity, we mean that investors have uncertainty about the present value of expected underwriting claims, that is, the economic value of the insurer's liability.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eckles et al (2014) results indicate that greater information quality does not affect the cost of equity capital but does increase the price that insurers charge customers (i.e., lowers the cost of debt capital). Chen et al (2017) present a model in which information quality (regardless of whether it is innate or discretionary) and the cost of equity capital are negatively related, holding insurers' real decisions (operating risk) constant. However, greater innate information quality also induces insurers to take more risk, which has a positive indirect effect on the cost of equity capital.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations