Information Sharing as a Dimension of Smartness: Understanding Benefits and Challenges in Two Megacities

Abstract

Cities around the world are facing increasingly complex problems. These problems frequently require collaboration and information sharing across agency boundaries. In our view, information sharing can be seen as an important dimension of what is recently being called smartness in cities and enables the ability to improve decision making and day-to-day operations in urban settings. Unfortunately, what many city managers are learning is that there are important challenges to sharing information both within their city and with others. Based on nonemergency service integration initiatives in New York City and Mexico City, this article examines important benefits from and challenges to information sharing in the context of what the participants characterize as smart city initiatives, particularly in large metropolitan areas. The research question guiding this study is as follows: To what extent do previous findings about information sharing hold in the context of city initiatives, particularly in megacities? The results provide evidence on the importance of some specific characteristics of cities and megalopolises and how they affect benefits and challenges of information sharing. For instance, cities seem to have more managerial flexibility than other jurisdictions such as state governments. In addition, megalopolises have most of the necessary technical skills and financial resources needed for information sharing and, therefore, these challenges are not as relevant as in other local governments.

Addressing territorial digital divides through ICT strategies: Are investment decisions consistent with local needs?

“…Specific policies have been implemented to address this "digital government divide" in the peripheral areas by strengthening collaboration among local governments (Ferro & Sorrentino, 2010). Other scholars have focused on the unique characteristics of particular territorial domains such as the "megacities", which give them several advantages compared to the surrounding areas in terms of digital government development (Gil-Garcia et al, 2019).…”

Latin American smart cities: Between worlding infatuation and crawling provincialising

“…For Shelton et al (2015: 22), ‘the problem is less with data, per se, and more with the uncritical, ahistorical and aspatial understandings of data often promoted within smart city imaginaries, themselves recycled from earlier attempts to make urban studies and planning “more scientific”’. These frameworks include proposals from organisational theory (Pierce et al, 2017), ecological wisdom (Young and Lieberknecht, 2018), collaboration or urban sharing (Gil-Garcia et al, 2019; Zyoska et al, 2019), open data (Pinheiro, 2017) and living indicators (Kaika, 2017). They have in common the notion that technology should be subservient to particular places and communities (Kitchin, 2014; McFarlane and Söderström, 2017), and emphasise the need to look at both grounded experiences and the materiality of interventions (Schindler and Marvin, 2018; Shelton et al, 2015; Wiig, 2015).…”

Smart Urban Tourism Destinations at a Crossroads

“…So, is there such a thing as 'smartness'? In many ways, smartness, like many related concepts, remains an elusive notion today as it is often domain dependent, referring to anything from smart TV sets and smart cars to smart systems and devices (Alter, 2019), urban energy management (Battarra et al, 2016), the environmental sustainability of cities (Balducci and Ferrara, 2018) or cross-agency information-sharing for better decision-making (Gil-Garcia et al, 2019), or urban governance (Gil-Garcia et al, 2016), among others. Regardless, in essence, the concept has often been used to refer to the impact that information and communication technologies (ICTs) have had on society and the economy (see, for instance, Dameri, 2017), with ICTs often used as an umbrella term to denote a wide array of technologies and advances in communication and connectivity (see, for instance, Rutherford, 2011; or, for a recent tourismfocused review on this topic, see Ivars-Baidal et al, 2019).…”