Information skills training: a systematic review of the literature^*

Abstract

The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care published by the Department of Health in 2001 provides a model of best practice and a framework for research in the health and social care sector. This article reviews the Department of Health Research Governance Framework, discusses the implications of research governance for library and information professionals undertaking research in the health- and social-care sector and recommends strategies for best practice within the information profession relating to research governance. The scope of the Framework document that covers both clinical and non-clinical research is outlined. Any research involving, amongst other issues, patients, NHS staff and use or access to NHS premises may require ethics committee approval. Particular reference is made to the roles, responsibilities and professional conduct and the systems needed to support effective research practice. Issues such as these combine to encourage the development of a quality research culture which supports best practice. Questions arise regarding the training and experience of researchers, and access to the necessary information and support. The use of the Framework to guide research practice complements the quality issues within the evidence-based practice movement and supports the ongoing development of a quality research culture. Recommendations are given in relation to the document's five domains of ethics, science, information, health and safety and finance and intellectual property. Practical recommendations are offered for incorporating research governance into research practice in ways which conform to the Framework's standards and which are particularly relevant for research practitioners in information science. Concluding comments support the use of the Research Governance Framework as a model for best practice.

Transforming Risk Assessment Tools from Paper to Electronic

“…It is critical to identify any non-computer related content that needs to be included in the training and understood before using the tool in patient care. The content of the training regarding the use of the tool in an electronic environment is taught by the computer training staff, however it is recommended in the literature (Brettle, 2003) that any practice related information should be taught by a Registered Nurse at a separate time. The learning process is quicker and the outcomes (e.g.…”

“…scoring scale, assessment criteria, number of assessment items, calculations), the staffs training period should be as close to the 'go-live' date as possible. The literature shows (Brettle, 2003) that training for any computer application is best learned with continued reinforced use of the application. Training too early may affect retention of the learned skills and training material.…”

“…The literature shows (Brettle, 2003) that there are numerous teaching methods and approaches to training that should be considered. Most health care organizations have a computer training staff who can assist with curriculum development.…”

“…These can be supplemented and sometimes replaced by electronic learning or (also known e-learning) options. The literature shows (Brettle, 2003) that e-learning is an efficient way to train staff when the content is not too complex. The benefit of this option is that it allows the user to learn the material at any time, day, or location.…”

Utilizing learning theories in the digital age: an introduction for health librarians

“…At least two health librarians have synthesized the evidence about instructional program delivery [11][12]. Other academic librarians, such as Peacock, McNamara, and Core, stress the importance of "sound pedagogical knowledge" in assuming teaching roles [13][14].…”