The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research 2021
DOI: 10.4324/9781315754499-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information structure

Abstract: Information structure is a field of linguistics covered in numerous books and articles. Information structure in sign languages has also been investigated almost from the first days of sign linguistics; however, as is often the case, most of the available studies focus on a very small number of sign languages, and among these, American Sign Language (ASL) is the one most prominently represented. Nevertheless, some interesting results have been obtained that can be relevant for the theory of information structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(adapted from Kimmelman 2014: 125) 4. CONTRAST ___________________________________________________________ 125 However, as Kimmelman & Pfau (2021) point out, for some SLs it has been argued that contrastive and non-contrastive focus can be marked by the same manual and non-manual markers (Crasborn & van der Kooij 2013, Kimmelman 2014, Herrmann 2015. They argue that there is a difference of degree, so contrast is more likely to be a subtype of focus rather than an orthogonal category.…”
Section: = Contrast Based On Discourse Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(adapted from Kimmelman 2014: 125) 4. CONTRAST ___________________________________________________________ 125 However, as Kimmelman & Pfau (2021) point out, for some SLs it has been argued that contrastive and non-contrastive focus can be marked by the same manual and non-manual markers (Crasborn & van der Kooij 2013, Kimmelman 2014, Herrmann 2015. They argue that there is a difference of degree, so contrast is more likely to be a subtype of focus rather than an orthogonal category.…”
Section: = Contrast Based On Discourse Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They argue that there is a difference of degree, so contrast is more likely to be a subtype of focus rather than an orthogonal category. Kimmelman & Pfau (2021) also state that it is not clear whether this type of marking can be applied when more than two alternatives are contrasted (cf. Kimmelman 2014).…”
Section: = Contrast Based On Discourse Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%