2014
DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2014.934287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information systems and performance: the role of technology, the task and the individual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These are all recognized as factors of IS acquisition success. However, defining success is ambiguous, since all stakeholders may not necessarily share the formal objectives [6,8]. Various stakeholders most likely have their own expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These are all recognized as factors of IS acquisition success. However, defining success is ambiguous, since all stakeholders may not necessarily share the formal objectives [6,8]. Various stakeholders most likely have their own expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IS acquisition success can also be viewed from the viewpoint of the success of the new system [6,13,14,38]. Here, the evaluation of the benefits of the new system are significant [13,14,41].…”
Section: Success Of Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SNS provide an interactive environment to deliver health information to cancer patients. Growing presence of the technology cause of an essential need to explore performance in the context of IS [28]. Most of the studies on SNS for cancer patients are more descriptive rather than theory building.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the literature suggests several approaches to measure Net Impacts of IS. Numerous researchers have focused on specific aspects of Net Impacts, such as organizational impact (Mirani and Lederer, 1998;Bradley, Pridmore and Byrd, 2006;Acheampong and Moyaid, 2016), individual impacts (Sedera, Gable and, & Chan, 2004;Bravo, Santana and Rodon, 2015), individual and organizational impacts (Sedera, Eden and McLean, 2013;Alshardan, Goodwin, and Rampersad, 2016), job performance (Torkzadeh and Doll, 1999;Sun and Teng, 2017;Ul-Ain, Vaia, and DeLone, 2019), collaborative performance (Andriessen, 2012;Hsu, et al, 2012), balanced scorecard approach (Martinsons, et al, 1999;Chang and King, 2005;Lee, Chen and Chang, 2008;Chen, et al, 2015 ;Hou, 2016;Motwani and Sharma, 2016 ;. Laumer, Maier, and Weitzel, 2017).…”
Section: Approaches To Measuring Net Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%