2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2924-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Systems Implementation for Asset Management: A Theoretical Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
0
5
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles that have cited citations in the Life Cycle Decision Making and Organization Path encourage the trend that construction companies transform their maintenance divisions into service providers (Ahonen, Reunanen, & Ojanen, 2010) and yet observe that they merely create temporary business units to win project contracts and avoid changing their overall business model (Leiringer, Green, & Raja, 2009). Some other articles mention that public agencies particularly struggle with using their internal organisational knowledge in asset management operations through their management capabilities (Chua & Goh, 2008;Nyström & Söderholm, 2010;Too, 2012) or implementation of information systems (Haider, 2013), and yet recognise that knowledge management plays an important role in realising objectives (Gibbons, Kennedy, Burgess, & Godfrey, 2012;Massa & Testa, 2009;Teece, 2011).…”
Section: Research Orientations Among Retrieved Articlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Articles that have cited citations in the Life Cycle Decision Making and Organization Path encourage the trend that construction companies transform their maintenance divisions into service providers (Ahonen, Reunanen, & Ojanen, 2010) and yet observe that they merely create temporary business units to win project contracts and avoid changing their overall business model (Leiringer, Green, & Raja, 2009). Some other articles mention that public agencies particularly struggle with using their internal organisational knowledge in asset management operations through their management capabilities (Chua & Goh, 2008;Nyström & Söderholm, 2010;Too, 2012) or implementation of information systems (Haider, 2013), and yet recognise that knowledge management plays an important role in realising objectives (Gibbons, Kennedy, Burgess, & Godfrey, 2012;Massa & Testa, 2009;Teece, 2011).…”
Section: Research Orientations Among Retrieved Articlesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…MIMOSA and ISO) are not being taken up as rapidly as expected. In reality, many AM implementations have been treated as serious and long term challenges by agencies (Pantelias et al, 2008;Haider, 2013). In reality, the discrepancy perspective barely addresses the consistency or otherwise in the decision making.…”
Section: State Of the Art In Assessing Asset Management Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles that have cited citations in the Life Cycle Decision Making and Organization path encourage the trend that construction companies transform their maintenance divisions into service providers (Ahonen et al, 2010) and yet observe that they merely create temporary business units to win project contracts and avoid changing their overall business model (Leiringer et al, 2009). Some other articles mention that public agencies particularly struggle with using their internal organizational knowledge in asset management operations through their management capabilities (Too, 2012;Chua and Goh, 2008;Nyström and Söderholm, 2010) or implementation of information systems (Haider, 2013), and yet recognizes that knowledge management plays an important role in realizing objectives (Massa and Testa, 2009;Teece, 2011;Gibbons et al 2012).…”
Section: Research Orientations Among Retrieved Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De acordo com Lee et al (2006), os dados gerados pelos equipamentos são pouco aproveitados para melhorar a sua gestão. Apesar da implantação de sistemas de informação que suportam o gerenciamento de ativos, as empresas relatam inconsistências nas informações decorrentes de falhas estratégicas, de gestão e operação (HAIDER, 2012). Reforçando essa lacuna, o estudo de Love et al (2016), relata que pesquisas futuras são necessárias para determinar a melhor forma de inserção dos sistemas de informação na gestão de ativos, devendo se atentar para os aspectos relacionados a assimilação de tecnologia.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified