2004
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-8095-6_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Systems in Organizations and Society: Speculating on the Next 25 Years of Research

Abstract: The community of scholars focused on information systems in organizations and society (the IFIP 8.2 community) has grown in number‚ voice‚ and influence over the last 25 years. What will this community contribute during the next 25 years? We speculate on two possible areas: more articulate conceptualizations of information systems and more detailed socio-technical theories of their effects. For both of these possibilities‚ we project forward from the historical trajectory of the IFIP 8.2 community's involvemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have added IFIP WG 8.2 because it has accepted research using a wide range of social theory to underpin the study of IS in organizations (e.g. see Jones, 2000; Flynn & Gregory, 2004) and has tended to attract critical research (Sawyer & Crowston, 2004), while IT&P’s stated editorial objectives include ‘an openness to multiple paradigms’ and an explicit commitment to publish ‘critical . .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have added IFIP WG 8.2 because it has accepted research using a wide range of social theory to underpin the study of IS in organizations (e.g. see Jones, 2000; Flynn & Gregory, 2004) and has tended to attract critical research (Sawyer & Crowston, 2004), while IT&P’s stated editorial objectives include ‘an openness to multiple paradigms’ and an explicit commitment to publish ‘critical . .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laboratories, equipment, libraries and a system of information storage, retrieval and ICT) (what does this mean?) remains inadequate as suggested by Sawyer and Crowston (2004).…”
Section: Research Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the progress of social informatics must be based both on the constant presentation of these common findings and, more importantly, the additional detailing that reflects how these common findings are suppressed or magnified through particular actions, events or arrangements, the temporal sequencing of engagements, and the contextual differences (and measures) between better and worse computerization efforts. To do this, we and others have argued for analytic approaches that are grounded in social informatics principles [Horton, Davenport, & Wood-Harper, 2005;Lamb & Sawyer, 2005;Sawyer & Crowston, 2004;.…”
Section: Socio-technical Principles and Social Informaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%