2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Technology Acceptance in Public Safety in Smart Sustainable Cities: A Qualitative Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the social relationship between users/providers must be considered during the design phase of social IoT applications. A system of social IoT can be thought of as a peer-to-peer (P2P) web of communities centred on the owner, with devices (owned by people) asking and delivering on behalf of service providers [13,14].…”
Section: Overview Of Iot and Big Data Information Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the social relationship between users/providers must be considered during the design phase of social IoT applications. A system of social IoT can be thought of as a peer-to-peer (P2P) web of communities centred on the owner, with devices (owned by people) asking and delivering on behalf of service providers [13,14].…”
Section: Overview Of Iot and Big Data Information Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide application of the UTAUT2 model has resulted in numerous proposals for its extension for particular contexts, including the smart cities (Tamilmani et al 2021 ). For example, for the acceptance of public safety solutions in the smart city Oliveira et al (Oliveira and Santos 2019 ) suggested the introduction of a way to evaluate how the contribution of the city and the citizens can impact the adoption. For the acceptance of smart government services, authors in Almuraqab and Jasimuddin ( 2017 ) suggested the new variables: Perceived trust in government, Perceived trust in technology, Perceived Compatibility, and Awareness to be considered with the positive impact, while Perceived Cost and Perceived Risk are expected to harm the end user's attitude.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this research was focusing on five variables namely Actual System Use (AU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Attitude Toward Using (ATU), Behavioral Intention to Use (BIU), and Perceived Usefulness (PU). Furthermore, one way to measure the successful implementation of smart cities is using the technology acceptance model approach (TAM) which has also been widely implemented in many previous studies (Alnemer, 2022;Dirgantari et al, 2020;Jnr & Petersen, 2022;Kabir et al, 2022;Kurdi et al, 2020;Oliveira & Santos, 2019;Rodzi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%