2007
DOI: 10.1093/sw/52.3.221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information Technology Acceptance in the Social Services Sector Context: An Exploration

Abstract: Although computers and information technology (IT) have penetrated the field of social work, little research has systematically studied how users respond to this infusion. Information systems researchers have accumulated significant insights into IT acceptance in business organizations after decades of efforts. In this study, users in the social services were assessed for their acceptance of IT. A research model based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior was developed, arguing that attitudes toward usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Attitude has also been used as a mediating variable of performance expectancy and effort expectancy in several studies that had used UTAUT (e.g., Alshare and Lane 2011;Knutsen 2005;Koh et al 2010;Rana et al 2017;Sumak et al 2010). We also propose that attitude would influence behavioural intention (i.e., Ajzen 1991;Davis 1989;Dwivedi et al 2017;Fishbein and Ajzen 1975;Rana et al 2016;2017, Taylor andTodd 1995b) based on prior empirical research (e.g., Chen and Lu 2011;Zhang and Gutierrez 2007). Figure 1 shows the proposed model of IS/IT acceptance and use whereas Table 2 presents the definition for the constructs used in our theoretical model.…”
Section: Proposed Model Of Is/it Acceptance and Usementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Attitude has also been used as a mediating variable of performance expectancy and effort expectancy in several studies that had used UTAUT (e.g., Alshare and Lane 2011;Knutsen 2005;Koh et al 2010;Rana et al 2017;Sumak et al 2010). We also propose that attitude would influence behavioural intention (i.e., Ajzen 1991;Davis 1989;Dwivedi et al 2017;Fishbein and Ajzen 1975;Rana et al 2016;2017, Taylor andTodd 1995b) based on prior empirical research (e.g., Chen and Lu 2011;Zhang and Gutierrez 2007). Figure 1 shows the proposed model of IS/IT acceptance and use whereas Table 2 presents the definition for the constructs used in our theoretical model.…”
Section: Proposed Model Of Is/it Acceptance and Usementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other studies (e.g., Chiu et al 2012;Park et al 2007;Sumak et al 2010) have provided empirical support for the relationship between social influence and attitude in the context of the IS/IT adoption literature in general. We also propose that attitude would influence behavioural intention (Fishbein and Ajzen 1975;Davis 1989;Ajzen 1991;Taylor and Todd 1995b), based on prior empirical research (e.g., Chen and Lu 2011;Cox 2012;Zhang and Gutierrez 2007).…”
Section: Proposed Research Model and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 In similar ways, consumers who consider OCF important should be more motivated to attend to and incorporate OCF when they make their purchase decisions. Larcker and Lessig defi ned perceived importance of information as ' the quality that causes a particular information set to acquire relevance to a decision maker ' and the extent to which ' the information items are a necessary input for task accomplishment ' (p. 123).…”
Section: Perceived Importance Of Ocfmentioning
confidence: 99%