2019
DOI: 10.1525/mp.2019.37.2.165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information-theoretic Modeling of Perceived Musical Complexity

Abstract: What makes a piece of music appear complex to a listener? This research extends previous work by Eerola (2016), examining information content generated by a computational model of auditory expectation (IDyOM) based on statistical learning and probabilistic prediction as an empirical definition of perceived musical complexity. We systematically manipulated the melody, rhythm, and harmony of short polyphonic musical excerpts using the model to ensure that these manipulations systematically varied information con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the study paradigm employed experts’ complexity ratings to define how difficult or easy it was to predict musical elements in the stimuli. Notably, not all acoustic features are important to the experience of predictability [ 27 , 38 , 60 ]. Hence, comparing liking ratings to complexity judgements, rather than acoustic features such as probability of pitch change, increased the likelihood of observing how people respond to music that is perceived as unpredictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the study paradigm employed experts’ complexity ratings to define how difficult or easy it was to predict musical elements in the stimuli. Notably, not all acoustic features are important to the experience of predictability [ 27 , 38 , 60 ]. Hence, comparing liking ratings to complexity judgements, rather than acoustic features such as probability of pitch change, increased the likelihood of observing how people respond to music that is perceived as unpredictable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If preference for predictability influences music preferences, then the extent to which a listener enjoys a piece of music should be contingent on the listener’s perceived levels of predictability. However, not all acoustic features contribute equally to the experience of predictability [ 27 , 38 , 60 ]. The likelihood of capturing facets relevant to preference might therefore be higher for subjective evaluations of predictability than for an assessment based on acoustic features.…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No matter how internalization occurs, internal models of the (permissible) musical structures are generated and applied whenever listening to novel music (Deliège, 1987;Agres, 2019). If the internal models somehow confront the (prescribed) rules of the arrangement of the constituent parts of a musical structure, the structure is perceived not only as irregular, but also as more complex and less enjoyable (Sauvé & Pearce 2019;Mihelač & Povh, 2020b). This is because more effort has to be put into the listening process, as the learned musical syntax and its rules have to be adjusted in order to understand the novel structures (Kramer, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDyOM is motivated by the idea that statistical learning applies across domains, and that melodic expectations are just one instance of this domain‐general learning. IDyOM's predictions have been shown to correlate with listener judgments of melodic uncertainty (Hansen & Pearce, 2014) and electrophysiological responses to melodic stimuli (Pearce, Ruiz, Kapasi, Wiggins, & Bhattacharya, 2010) as well as phenomena such as melodic segmentation (Pearce, Müllensiefen, & Wiggins, 2010), expressive timing (Gingras et al., 2016), and perceived musical complexity (Sauvé & Pearce, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%