The article by Bracci et al. on information to cancer patients in three different geographic areas in Italy, published in this issue of our journal, provides empirical evidence that attitudes and practices of disclosure to cancer patients have evolved in Italy [3]. A shift toward truth telling began in Italy and in many other countries in the late 1980s-early 1990s [26,32]. Under the influence of many intertwined medical, legal, and societal changes, patients' information and involvement in decision making regarding their cancer care has been steadily increasing. In Italy, major changes occurred both in legislation and in the code of professional medical ethics, which now require physicians to provide full information to their patients and obtain their written consent for all medical and surgical procedures [30, 31]. Cultural transformations, however, are not the same as regulatory ones and do not proceed at the same pace. Empirical studies performed in Italy and other countries, in fact, persistently revealed that partial and non disclosure were still supported and practiced by physicians and that the actual rate of disclosure remained low even among those who claimed to favor patients' right to information and participation. Patient surveys also continued to show that many cancer patients were unaware of the severity and curability of their illness [12,13,18,35,36]. Important variations were observed in patient and physician attitudes and practices toward disclosure in association with age, geographic location (including residence in urban versus rural communities and in northern versus southern areas of different countries), and type of treating institution.By contrast, the study by Bracci et al. suggests that today's Italian cancer patients understand the benefits of learning the truth about their diagnosis and treatment options from their doctors and know how to express their level of satisfaction with the information provided and how to articulate the areas in which communication failed or was insufficient [3]. The study also examined different patient-doctor relationship styles, which are also evolving in countries where paternalism had traditionally been dominant in clinical medicine, and explored their link with their patients' information preferences and satisfaction [3,29]. Additional studies recently performed in Italy outside the field of oncology also indicate that open communication of diagnosis and treatment options is now common in other chronic, severe, often life-threatening illnesses [10].Patients in Bracci's study were treated in different geographic areas of Italy at three large teaching hospitals [3]. Within the context of teaching hospitals or specialized oncologic units, cancer patients are naturally exposed to more information than those who are treated at small local hospitals or in general wards or outpatient clinics. Nevertheless, differences emerged among patients within the study [3]. The authors' finding of persisting differences between Northern and Southern Italian patients speak...