2018
DOI: 10.11613/bm.2018.030201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed consent and ethics committee approval in laboratory medicine

Abstract: Informed consent is a process in which a human subject who is to participate in research needs to give his or her consent after being properly informed of the expected benefits as well as the potential harm of the research that will be performed. The function and purpose of the research ethics committee is to ensure that the research that will take place is in accordance with the relevant ethical standards. This means that the committee must assess the appropriateness of the design of the study reviewed. Resea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Crude DNA extracts from the following specimens were used for this study: Frozen pure cultures of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strain B31 (ATCC 53210) and Borrelia coriaceae (ATCC 43381) in liquid media purchased from ATCC;Venous blood specimens collected from U.S. patients submitted by licensed physicians for “Lyme bacteria” tests as part of routine patient management and 25 blind-coded simulated patient blood specimens from New York State (NYS) Department of Health (DOH) for a Borrelia burgdorferi proficiency test; the patients’ informed consent was not required because it is implied that informed consent was previously given for the scope of the treatment and because the patients’ identities were not revealed; ethical approval was not required because it is considered that this was not research but clinical/laboratory practice [41]. Blind-coded archived serum samples derived from patients with and without “Lyme disease” from the CDC under two Material Transfer Agreements (MTA No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crude DNA extracts from the following specimens were used for this study: Frozen pure cultures of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto strain B31 (ATCC 53210) and Borrelia coriaceae (ATCC 43381) in liquid media purchased from ATCC;Venous blood specimens collected from U.S. patients submitted by licensed physicians for “Lyme bacteria” tests as part of routine patient management and 25 blind-coded simulated patient blood specimens from New York State (NYS) Department of Health (DOH) for a Borrelia burgdorferi proficiency test; the patients’ informed consent was not required because it is implied that informed consent was previously given for the scope of the treatment and because the patients’ identities were not revealed; ethical approval was not required because it is considered that this was not research but clinical/laboratory practice [41]. Blind-coded archived serum samples derived from patients with and without “Lyme disease” from the CDC under two Material Transfer Agreements (MTA No.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venous blood specimens collected from U.S. patients submitted by licensed physicians for “Lyme bacteria” tests as part of routine patient management and 25 blind-coded simulated patient blood specimens from New York State (NYS) Department of Health (DOH) for a Borrelia burgdorferi proficiency test; the patients’ informed consent was not required because it is implied that informed consent was previously given for the scope of the treatment and because the patients’ identities were not revealed; ethical approval was not required because it is considered that this was not research but clinical/laboratory practice [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DC-2008-642). In line with the regulations set out by the French National Data Protection Commission and international guidelines, written, informed consent was neither required nor requested for this non-interventional study ( 8 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was conducted in accordance with the Principles of Good Clinical Practice and the Declaration of Helsinki and was in agreement with the Ethical code of PTP Science Park (Lodi, Italy) (https://www.ptp.it/it/about-us#governance). The collection of fecal samples from donors healthy volunteers was performed after Written informed consent in an anonimyzed way, and any information cannot be directly related to each volunteer [33].…”
Section: Declarations Ethics Approval and Consent To Participatementioning
confidence: 99%