1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199901)19:1<1::aid-pd456>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informed consent to serum screening for Down syndrome: are women given adequate information?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
67
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
67
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, however, 74 % of women who underwent an invasive test reported that they might consider a termination of pregnancy if DS was diagnosed, a result well in line with that of Gekas et al (1999). It might well be that women who underwent an invasive test had gone through a more meticulous decisionmaking process, compared to women who underwent a screening procedure, as invasive tests are diagnostic and involve increased risks for the pregnancy.…”
Section: Ds Down Syndrome Pnd Prenatal Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, however, 74 % of women who underwent an invasive test reported that they might consider a termination of pregnancy if DS was diagnosed, a result well in line with that of Gekas et al (1999). It might well be that women who underwent an invasive test had gone through a more meticulous decisionmaking process, compared to women who underwent a screening procedure, as invasive tests are diagnostic and involve increased risks for the pregnancy.…”
Section: Ds Down Syndrome Pnd Prenatal Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 48%
“…In a previous study on expectant parents who underwent a CUB-test (Ternby et al 2015), we found that 43 % of the participants responded that they might consider termination of pregnancy if DS was diagnosed, a figure far below the 80.5 % reported by Gekas et al (1999) who asked women who underwent an invasive test. In the present study, however, 74 % of women who underwent an invasive test reported that they might consider a termination of pregnancy if DS was diagnosed, a result well in line with that of Gekas et al (1999).…”
Section: Ds Down Syndrome Pnd Prenatal Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Yet, informed decision making about prenatal screening requires thoughtful consideration of personal values, possible outcomes, and risk-benefit tradeoffs. [2,7,16,23] Interpretive labels, however, are directive, especially when provided by "expert" medical professionals. They encourage binary categorization of outcomes as either good or bad while inhibiting patients' ability to integrate the test results within the context of their personal preferences.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, research has assessed both how prenatal screening tests are presented to patients and how they are discussed by health care providers. [1,2] Research has also considered women's attitudes regarding testing and evaluated the degree to which women's decisions whether to have screening tests are informed and consistent with their own preferences. [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In der Vergangenheit konnten Frauen, die sich Entscheidungskonflikte ersparen und das Ungeborene, so wie es ist, annehmen wollten, die Amniozentese, die ihnen aufgrund ihres Alters (ab 35 Jahre) angeboten wurde, ablehnen. Etwa 20 bis 25 Prozent der Frauen machten in den Neunzigern von dieser Option Gebrauch (Nippert/Horst 1994 (Gekas et al 1999;Smith et al 1994).…”
unclassified