2017
DOI: 10.7249/rr2042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informing Progress: Insights on Personalized Learning Implementation and Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
89
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
89
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Quite the contrary, despite the recurring interest in the theme and the constancy of academic interest that it arouses (reflected in the constant appearance in the literature specialised in educational technology of the last 50 years), it seems that the results of recent experiments, are at least inconclusive (Pane, Steiner, Baird, Hamilton, & Pane, 2017). But what is even more worrying is the fact that "pedagogical gaps" are increasingly more evident and recurrent in almost all the literature on personalisation, and related to which educational model (with all its nuances) underpins how technology has tried to respond to the differentiation of the teaching-learning processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite the contrary, despite the recurring interest in the theme and the constancy of academic interest that it arouses (reflected in the constant appearance in the literature specialised in educational technology of the last 50 years), it seems that the results of recent experiments, are at least inconclusive (Pane, Steiner, Baird, Hamilton, & Pane, 2017). But what is even more worrying is the fact that "pedagogical gaps" are increasingly more evident and recurrent in almost all the literature on personalisation, and related to which educational model (with all its nuances) underpins how technology has tried to respond to the differentiation of the teaching-learning processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emerging body of research about personalized learning is largely focused on describing these approaches in practice (e.g., Pane, Steiner, Baird, Hamilton, & Pane, 2017;Patrick et al, 2016) and understanding shifts for teachers (e.g., Jobs for the Future and the Council of Chief State School Officers, 2015; Nagle & Taylor, 2017). While there is an emerging body of scholarship examining personalized learning in the middle grades, there is very little written about the perceptions of middle grades students who are engaged in personalized learning (Williams, Wallace, & Sung, 2016).…”
Section: Learner Perceptions Of Personalized Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research on personalized learning has primarily focused on describing its enactment in practice (e.g., Pane, Steiner, Baird, Hamilton, & Pane, 2017;Patrick, Worthen, Frost, & Gentz, 2016) and how it changes teachers' roles and responsibilities in the classroom (e.g., Nagle & Taylor, 2017). There remains a relative lack of research on middle-grade students' experiences with personalized learning, including studies on their perceptions of opportunities for choice in their learning (Williams et al, 2016).…”
Section: Middle Grades Student Perceptions Of Personalized Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%